Fiber type-specific nitric oxide protects oxidative myofibers against cachectic stimuli.

Oxidative skeletal muscles are more resistant than glycolytic muscles to cachexia caused by chronic heart failure and other chronic diseases. The molecular mechanism for the protection associated with oxidative phenotype remains elusive. We hypothesized that differences in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) determine the fiber type susceptibility. Here, we show that intraperitoneal injection of endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) in mice resulted in higher level of ROS and greater expression of muscle-specific E3 ubiqitin ligases, muscle atrophy F-box (MAFbx)/atrogin-1 and muscle RING finger-1 (MuRF1), in glycolytic white vastus lateralis muscle than in oxidative soleus muscle. By contrast, NO production, inducible NO synthase (iNos) and antioxidant gene expression were greatly enhanced in oxidative, but not in glycolytic muscles, suggesting that NO mediates protection against muscle wasting. NO donors enhanced iNos and antioxidant gene expression and blocked cytokine/endotoxin-induced MAFbx/atrogin-1 expression in cultured myoblasts and in skeletal muscle in vivo. Our studies reveal a novel protective mechanism in oxidative myofibers mediated by enhanced iNos and antioxidant gene expression and suggest a significant value of enhanced NO signaling as a new therapeutic strategy for cachexia.

Evaluation of Altered Kras Codon Bias and NOS Inhibition During Lung Tumorigenesis

The small GTPases HRAS, NRAS and KRAS are mutated in approximately one-third of all human cancers, rendering the proteins constitutively active and oncogenic. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and more than 20% of human lung cancers harbor mutations in RAS, with 98% of those occurring in the KRAS isoform. While there have been many advances in the understanding of KRAS–driven lung tumorigenesis, it remains a therapeutic challenge. To further this understanding and assess novel approaches for treatment, I have investigated two aspects of Kras–driven tumorigenesis in the lung:

(I) Despite nearly identical protein sequences, the three RAS proto-oncogenes exhibit divergent codon usage. Of the three isoforms, KRAS contains the most rare codons resulting in lower levels of KRAS protein expression relative to HRAS and NRAS. To determine the consequences of rare codon bias during de novo tumorigenesis, we created a knock-in Krasex3op mouse in which synonymous mutations in exon 3 converted codons from rare to common. These mice had reduced tumor burden and fewer oncogenic mutations in the Krasex3op allele following carcinogen exposure. The reduction in tumorigenesis appeared to be a product of rare codons affecting both the oncogenic and non–oncogenic alleles. Converting rare codons to common codons yielded a more potent oncogenic allele that promoted growth arrest and enhanced tumor suppression by the non-oncogenic allele. Thus, rare codons play an integral role in Kras tumorigenesis.

(II) Lung cancer patients exhale higher levels of NO and iNOS-/- mice are resistant to chemically induced lung tumorigenesis. I hypothesize that NO promotes Kras–driven lung adenocarcinoma, and NOS inhibition may decrease Kras–driven lung tumorigenesis. To test this hypothesis, I assessed efficacy of the NOS inhibitor L–NAME in a genetically engineered mouse model of Kras-driven lung adenocarcinoma. Adenoviral Cre recombinase was delivered into the lungs intranasally, resulting in expression of oncogenic KrasG12D and dominant-negative Trp53R172H in lung epithelial cells. L–NAME treatment was provided in the water and continued until survival endpoints. In this model, L–NAME treatment decreased tumor growth and prolonged survival. These data establish a potential clinical role for NOS inhibition in lung cancer treatment.