Integrin-mediated interactions with extracellular matrix proteins for nucleus pulposus cells of the human intervertebral disc.

The extracellular matrix (ECM) of the human intervertebral disc is rich in molecules that interact with cells through integrin-mediated attachments. Porcine nucleus pulposus (NP) cells have been shown to interact with laminin (LM) isoforms LM-111 and LM-511 through select integrins that regulate biosynthesis and cell attachment. Since human NP cells lose many phenotypic characteristics with age, attachment and interaction with the ECM may be altered. Expression of LM-binding integrins was quantified for human NP cells using flow cytometry. The cell-ECM attachment mechanism was determined by quantifying cell attachment to LM-111, LM-511, or type II collagen after functionally blocking specific integrin subunits. Human NP cells express integrins β1, α3, and α5, with over 70% of cells positive for each subunit. Blocking subunit β1 inhibited NP cell attachment to all substrates. Blocking subunits α1, α2, α3, and α5 simultaneously, but not individually, inhibits NP cell attachment to laminins. While integrin α6β1 mediated porcine NP cell attachment to LM-111, we found integrins α3, α5, and β1 instead contributed to human NP cell attachment. These findings identify integrin subunits that may mediate interactions with the ECM for human NP cells and could be used to promote cell attachment, survival, and biosynthesis in cell-based therapeutics.

Evaluation of Altered Kras Codon Bias and NOS Inhibition During Lung Tumorigenesis

The small GTPases HRAS, NRAS and KRAS are mutated in approximately one-third of all human cancers, rendering the proteins constitutively active and oncogenic. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, and more than 20% of human lung cancers harbor mutations in RAS, with 98% of those occurring in the KRAS isoform. While there have been many advances in the understanding of KRAS–driven lung tumorigenesis, it remains a therapeutic challenge. To further this understanding and assess novel approaches for treatment, I have investigated two aspects of Kras–driven tumorigenesis in the lung:

(I) Despite nearly identical protein sequences, the three RAS proto-oncogenes exhibit divergent codon usage. Of the three isoforms, KRAS contains the most rare codons resulting in lower levels of KRAS protein expression relative to HRAS and NRAS. To determine the consequences of rare codon bias during de novo tumorigenesis, we created a knock-in Krasex3op mouse in which synonymous mutations in exon 3 converted codons from rare to common. These mice had reduced tumor burden and fewer oncogenic mutations in the Krasex3op allele following carcinogen exposure. The reduction in tumorigenesis appeared to be a product of rare codons affecting both the oncogenic and non–oncogenic alleles. Converting rare codons to common codons yielded a more potent oncogenic allele that promoted growth arrest and enhanced tumor suppression by the non-oncogenic allele. Thus, rare codons play an integral role in Kras tumorigenesis.

(II) Lung cancer patients exhale higher levels of NO and iNOS-/- mice are resistant to chemically induced lung tumorigenesis. I hypothesize that NO promotes Kras–driven lung adenocarcinoma, and NOS inhibition may decrease Kras–driven lung tumorigenesis. To test this hypothesis, I assessed efficacy of the NOS inhibitor L–NAME in a genetically engineered mouse model of Kras-driven lung adenocarcinoma. Adenoviral Cre recombinase was delivered into the lungs intranasally, resulting in expression of oncogenic KrasG12D and dominant-negative Trp53R172H in lung epithelial cells. L–NAME treatment was provided in the water and continued until survival endpoints. In this model, L–NAME treatment decreased tumor growth and prolonged survival. These data establish a potential clinical role for NOS inhibition in lung cancer treatment.

Consensus nomenclature for the human ArfGAP domain-containing proteins.

At the FASEB summer research conference on "Arf Family GTPases", held in Il Ciocco, Italy in June, 2007, it became evident to researchers that our understanding of the family of Arf GTPase activating proteins (ArfGAPs) has grown exponentially in recent years. A common nomenclature for these genes and proteins will facilitate discovery of biological functions and possible connections to pathogenesis. Nearly 100 researchers were contacted to generate a consensus nomenclature for human ArfGAPs. This article describes the resulting consensus nomenclature and provides a brief description of each of the 10 subfamilies of 31 human genes encoding proteins containing the ArfGAP domain.