1 resultado para Technology Concepts And Processes
em DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland)
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (5)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Archive of European Integration (13)
- Aston University Research Archive (61)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (37)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (91)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (26)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (29)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (8)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (16)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (26)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (15)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (6)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (12)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (40)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (44)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (8)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (22)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (10)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (2)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (5)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (9)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (23)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (42)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (13)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (23)
- Universidade do Minho (68)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (24)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (49)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (46)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (6)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (7)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (5)
Resumo:
Problem This dissertation presents a literature-based framework for communication in science (with the elements partners, purposes, message, and channel), which it then applies in and amends through an empirical study of how geoscientists use two social computing technologies (SCTs), blogging and Twitter (both general use and tweeting from conferences). How are these technologies used and what value do scientists derive from them? Method The empirical part used a two-pronged qualitative study, using (1) purposive samples of ~400 blog posts and ~1000 tweets and (2) a purposive sample of 8 geoscientist interviews. Blog posts, tweets, and interviews were coded using the framework, adding new codes as needed. The results were aggregated into 8 geoscientist case studies, and general patterns were derived through cross-case analysis. Results A detailed picture of how geoscientists use blogs and twitter emerged, including a number of new functions not served by traditional channels. Some highlights: Geoscientists use SCTs for communication among themselves as well as with the public. Blogs serve persuasion and personal knowledge management; Twitter often amplifies the signal of traditional communications such as journal articles. Blogs include tutorials for peers, reviews of basic science concepts, and book reviews. Twitter includes links to readings, requests for assistance, and discussions of politics and religion. Twitter at conferences provides live coverage of sessions. Conclusions Both blogs and Twitter are routine parts of scientists' communication toolbox, blogs for in-depth, well-prepared essays, Twitter for faster and broader interactions. Both have important roles in supporting community building, mentoring, and learning and teaching. The Framework of Communication in Science was a useful tool in studying these two SCTs in this domain. The results should encourage science administrators to facilitate SCT use of scientists in their organization and information providers to search SCT documents as an important source of information.