ANTICANCER MECHANISM OF TOLFENAMIC ACID IN COLORECTAL CANCER

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Chemopreventive therapies could be effective way to treat CRC. Tolfenamic acid, one of the NSAIDs, shows anti-cancer activities in several types of cancer. Aberrant Wnt/β-catenin regulation pathway is a major mechanism of colon tumorigenesis. Here, we sought to better define the mechanism by which tolfenamic acid suppresses colorectal tumorigenesis focusing on regulation of β-catenin pathway. Treatment of tolfenamic acid led to a down-regulation of β-catenin expression in dose dependent manner in human colon cancer cell lines without changing mRNA. MG132 inhibited tolfenamic acid-induced downregulation of β-catenin and exogenously overexpression β-catenin was stabilized in the presence of tolfenamic acid. Tolfenamic acid induced an ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation of β-catenin. In addition, tolfenamic acid treatment decreased transcriptional activity of β-catenin and expression of Smad2 and Smad3 while overexpression of Smad 2 inhibited tolfenamic acid-stimulated transcriptional activity of β-catenin. Moreover, tolfenamic acid decreased β-catenin target gene such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and cyclin D1. In summary, tolfenamic acid is a promising therapeutic drug targeting Smad 2-mediated downregulation of β-catenin in CRC.

The relationship between health literacy and indicators of informed decision making for colorectal cancer screening among African Americans

African Americans are disproportionately affected by colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. CRC early detection leads to better treatment outcomes and, depending on the screening test, can prevent the development of CRC. African Americans, however, are screened less often than Whites. Aspects of decision making (e.g., decisional conflict, decision self-efficacy) can impact decision making outcomes and may be influenced by social determinants of health, including health literacy. However the relationship between social determinants of health and indicators of decision making in this population is not fully understood. Additionally, individuals have a choice between different CRC screening tests and an individual’s desire to use a particular screening test may be associated with social determinants of health such as health literacy. This study aimed to examine the relationship between social determinants of health and indicators of decision making for CRC screening among African Americans. A total of 111 participants completed a baseline and 14-month follow-up survey assessing decisional conflict, decision self-efficacy, decisional preference (shared versus informed decision making), and CRC test preference. Health literacy was negatively associated with decisional conflict and positively associated with decision self-efficacy (ps < .05). Individuals who were unemployed or working part-time had significantly greater decisional conflict than individuals working full-time (ps < .05). Individuals with a first-degree family history of CRC had significantly lower decision self-efficacy than individuals without a family history (p < .05). Women were significantly more likely to prefer making a shared decision rather than an informed decision compared to men (p < .05). Lastly, previous CRC screening behavior was significantly associated with CRC test preference (e.g., individuals previously screened using colonoscopy were significantly more likely to prefer colonoscopy for their next screening test; ps < .05). These findings begin to identify social determinants of health (e.g., health literacy, employment) that are related to indicators of decision making for CRC among African Americans. Furthermore, these findings suggest further research is needed to better understand these relationships to help with the future development and improvement of interventions targeting decision making outcomes for CRC screening in this population.