1 resultado para grade and tonnage models
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- University of Cagliari UniCA Eprints (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (7)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (9)
- Aston University Research Archive (16)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (18)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (27)
- Boston University Digital Common (5)
- Brock University, Canada (13)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (9)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (27)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (117)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (15)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (10)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (7)
- CUNY Academic Works (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (5)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (5)
- Duke University (9)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (8)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (11)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (15)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (41)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (6)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (87)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (180)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (8)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (5)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (54)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (4)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (12)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (11)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (11)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (17)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Lessons from around the world; What does it matter about early childhood education? Why the controversy about public support for early childhood education? What process or system should be used to determine what works in early education? Can the same process be used to improve services? What is the role of government? Alternatives: 1. Consumers should determine… (What happens when private choices drive the market for early childhood services?) Observed quality of care in four Midwestern states; Parent data: “All things considered, how would you grade the quality of the care your child is receiving from his/her current caregiver?” Role of government What is a Quality Rating System? Ten states have implemented statewide systems (e.g. Colorado, Kentucky, Oklahoma, North Carolina) Findings 2. Objective science should determine… Firm findings from empirical research 3. Something else is needed: Some differences between Italian and American models. Teacher action research (and documentation) from a Reggio-inspired preschool in South Korea by Misuk Kim. Teacher Action Research at the Ruth Staples CDL. Can we now answer our opening questions? What process or system should be used to determine what is best for young children? Can the same process be used to improve the quality of services? Conclusions: The free market does not work well to determine quality in early education and care; Licensing, accreditation, and quality rating systems can help improve the market; Empirical research is useful for measuring what works; Teacher action research (reflective practice) is necessary for fostering continuous quality improvement. The tower of quality.