1 resultado para cross-sectional area
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- Aberdeen University (4)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (18)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (40)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (42)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (9)
- Bioline International (17)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (126)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (15)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (28)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (22)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (7)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (78)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (9)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (9)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (123)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- Scielo España (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (40)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (110)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (30)
Resumo:
We assessed the efficacy of free-ranging dogs, confined by buried fences and electronic collars, for reducing deer damage to apple trees in three commercial apple orchards in Oswego County, New York State. During 1995 and 1996, we monitored paired dog-protected and control plots in each orchard. Within dog-protected areas, the percentage of damaged buds was lower, and fruit yield was higher in both 1995 and 1996 than for control plots. Gross economic returns were higher from dog-protected than control plots in both 1995 (by 51%) and 1996 (by 184%). After two seasons of growth, trees planted in May 1995 had nearly three times the cross-sectional area, and were 60% taller if they were in dog-protected rather than control plots. Dogs provided increased economic returns for growers at much lower cost than conventional barrier fencing.