1 resultado para collateral
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Archive of European Integration (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (18)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (85)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (14)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (21)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (11)
- Duke University (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (13)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (29)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (91)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (24)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (1)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (46)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (10)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (2)
- University of Michigan (38)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
Academics across the country are having an allergic reaction to the corporate model of operation being adopted by many universities. Terms like branding, collateral materials, budget controls, marketing strategies, and outcomes are causing a panic among faculty who believe that a customer satisfaction approach to higher education is anti-intellectual and that it leads to grade inflation, teaching toward evaluations, and learning as product, not process. Honors programs in particular, often the standard bearers of undergraduate academic standards, are being asked to market themselves not only to the top prospective students, but also to the university administration at large. Honors is frequently the default focus group expected to show the rest of the university programs and departments ‘How it is done,’ or rather, ‘How it is done according to standard.’ By ‘it,’ of course, I mean marketing our curriculum, selling our program, and branding our product.