1 resultado para archaeology of Iran
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (7)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (5)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (44)
- Archive of European Integration (19)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (7)
- Aston University Research Archive (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (14)
- Bioline International (10)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (30)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (168)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (9)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (17)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (23)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (17)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (191)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (65)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (5)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (21)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (5)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (16)
- University of Michigan (66)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (39)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
The field of archaeology incorporates a confusing assortment of ideas and approaches to the record. With studies ranging widely in ideology and goals, from strict descriptive materialism to sociological interpretation, language used to communicate key concepts (not to mention which concepts are key) also varies widely, resulting in low levels of mutual interest and intelligibility across the discipline. Archaeologists commonly ignore the majority of available literature as a result, further widening intellectual chasms.