1 resultado para Specialized Education Services
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (4)
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (9)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (3)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (20)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (6)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (11)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (12)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (13)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (21)
- Digital Peer Publishing (8)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (12)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (3)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (35)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (248)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (6)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (6)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (6)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (35)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RIBERDIS - Repositorio IBERoamericano sobre DIScapacidad - Centro Español de Documentación sobre Discapacidad (CEDD) (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (7)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (16)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (147)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (43)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Lessons from around the world; What does it matter about early childhood education? Why the controversy about public support for early childhood education? What process or system should be used to determine what works in early education? Can the same process be used to improve services? What is the role of government? Alternatives: 1. Consumers should determine… (What happens when private choices drive the market for early childhood services?) Observed quality of care in four Midwestern states; Parent data: “All things considered, how would you grade the quality of the care your child is receiving from his/her current caregiver?” Role of government What is a Quality Rating System? Ten states have implemented statewide systems (e.g. Colorado, Kentucky, Oklahoma, North Carolina) Findings 2. Objective science should determine… Firm findings from empirical research 3. Something else is needed: Some differences between Italian and American models. Teacher action research (and documentation) from a Reggio-inspired preschool in South Korea by Misuk Kim. Teacher Action Research at the Ruth Staples CDL. Can we now answer our opening questions? What process or system should be used to determine what is best for young children? Can the same process be used to improve the quality of services? Conclusions: The free market does not work well to determine quality in early education and care; Licensing, accreditation, and quality rating systems can help improve the market; Empirical research is useful for measuring what works; Teacher action research (reflective practice) is necessary for fostering continuous quality improvement. The tower of quality.