1 resultado para One-point attachment
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (6)
- Archive of European Integration (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (18)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (235)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (35)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (5)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (17)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (10)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (13)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Harvard University (2)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (2)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (4)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (8)
- Ohio University (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (6)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (3)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (54)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (9)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (78)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (11)
- Universidad de Alicante (11)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (12)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (35)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (20)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (230)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (5)
Resumo:
ABSTRACT This thesis will determine if there is a discrepancy between how literature defines conservation, preservation, and restoration, and how natural resource professionals define these terms. Interviews were conducted with six professionals from six different agencies that deal with natural resources. These agencies consisted of both government and non-government groups. In addition to interviewing these professionals regarding how they define the terms, they were asked where their work fits into the context of these terms. The interviewees’ responses were then compared with the literature to determine inconsistencies with the use of these terms in the literature and real world settings. The literature and the interviewees have agreed on the term conservation. There are some different points of view about preservation, some see it as ‘no management’ and some others see it as keeping things the same or ‘static.’ Restoration was the term where both the literature and professionals thought of moving an ecosystem from one point of succession or community, to another point on a continuum. The only thing in which they disagree on is the final goal of a restoration project. The literature would suggest restoring the ecosystem to a past historic condition, where the interviewees said to restore it to the best of their abilities and to a functioning ecosystem.