1 resultado para Mental health. Mental health services. Health manpower. Professional role. Politics. Teaching
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (10)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (15)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (20)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (9)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (9)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (36)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Duke University (7)
- Escola Superior de Educação de Paula Frassinetti (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco - Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Línguas & Letras - Unoeste (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (56)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (126)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (47)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (6)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (20)
- Universidad de Alicante (7)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (21)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (24)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (105)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (68)
- University of Washington (7)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (4)
Resumo:
Lessons from around the world; What does it matter about early childhood education? Why the controversy about public support for early childhood education? What process or system should be used to determine what works in early education? Can the same process be used to improve services? What is the role of government? Alternatives: 1. Consumers should determine (What happens when private choices drive the market for early childhood services?) Observed quality of care in four Midwestern states; Parent data: All things considered, how would you grade the quality of the care your child is receiving from his/her current caregiver? Role of government What is a Quality Rating System? Ten states have implemented statewide systems (e.g. Colorado, Kentucky, Oklahoma, North Carolina) Findings 2. Objective science should determine Firm findings from empirical research 3. Something else is needed: Some differences between Italian and American models. Teacher action research (and documentation) from a Reggio-inspired preschool in South Korea by Misuk Kim. Teacher Action Research at the Ruth Staples CDL. Can we now answer our opening questions? What process or system should be used to determine what is best for young children? Can the same process be used to improve the quality of services? Conclusions: The free market does not work well to determine quality in early education and care; Licensing, accreditation, and quality rating systems can help improve the market; Empirical research is useful for measuring what works; Teacher action research (reflective practice) is necessary for fostering continuous quality improvement. The tower of quality.