1 resultado para Lee Teng-hui
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (4)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (1)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (13)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (8)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (6)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (20)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (19)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (4)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (76)
- Harvard University (13)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (5)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (7)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (11)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (143)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (38)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (16)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (276)
- RIBERDIS - Repositorio IBERoamericano sobre DIScapacidad - Centro Español de Documentación sobre Discapacidad (CEDD) (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (4)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (4)
- University of Michigan (221)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (4)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
The field of archaeology incorporates a confusing assortment of ideas and approaches to the record. With studies ranging widely in ideology and goals, from strict descriptive materialism to sociological interpretation, language used to communicate key concepts (not to mention which concepts are key) also varies widely, resulting in low levels of mutual interest and intelligibility across the discipline. Archaeologists commonly ignore the majority of available literature as a result, further widening intellectual chasms.