1 resultado para Lee, Ann, 1736-1784
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (8)
- ARCA - Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (1)
- Archive of European Integration (11)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biblioteca Digital Loyola - Universidad de Deusto (1)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (14)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (4)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (14)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (32)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (21)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (15)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (3)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (11)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (20)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (18)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (15)
- Harvard University (79)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (12)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (16)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (15)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (57)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (39)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (44)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (23)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (5)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (39)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (5)
- University of Michigan (355)
- University of Washington (2)
Resumo:
The field of archaeology incorporates a confusing assortment of ideas and approaches to the record. With studies ranging widely in ideology and goals, from strict descriptive materialism to sociological interpretation, language used to communicate key concepts (not to mention which concepts are key) also varies widely, resulting in low levels of mutual interest and intelligibility across the discipline. Archaeologists commonly ignore the majority of available literature as a result, further widening intellectual chasms.