1 resultado para Isis (Egyptian deity)
em DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (9)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (8)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (18)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (15)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (9)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (10)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (1)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (7)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (44)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (9)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (31)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (14)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (5)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Harvard University (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Helvia: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Córdoba (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (3)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (53)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (6)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (9)
- Ohio University (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (11)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (50)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (26)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (26)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (6)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de El Salvador (3)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (2)
- Repositorio Institucional del Centro Atomico Bariloche y el Instituto Balseiro (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (25)
- RICABIB: Repositorio Institucional del Centro Atomico Bariloche e Instituto Balseiro - Argentina (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (24)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (4)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (8)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (6)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (17)
- University of Michigan (219)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (5)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
Resumo:
Software product line (SPL) engineering offers several advantages in the development of families of software products such as reduced costs, high quality and a short time to market. A software product line is a set of software intensive systems, each of which shares a common core set of functionalities, but also differs from the other products through customization tailored to fit the needs of individual groups of customers. The differences between products within the family are well-understood and organized into a feature model that represents the variability of the SPL. Products can then be built by generating and composing features described in the feature model. Testing of software product lines has become a bottleneck in the SPL development lifecycle, since many of the techniques used in their testing have been borrowed from traditional software testing and do not directly take advantage of the similarities between products. This limits the overall gains that can be achieved in SPL engineering. Recent work proposed by both industry and the research community for improving SPL testing has begun to consider this problem, but there is still a need for better testing techniques that are tailored to SPL development. In this thesis, I make two primary contributions to software product line testing. First I propose a new definition for testability of SPLs that is based on the ability to re-use test cases between products without a loss of fault detection effectiveness. I build on this idea to identify elements of the feature model that contribute positively and/or negatively towards SPL testability. Second, I provide a graph based testing approach called the FIG Basis Path method that selects products and features for testing based on a feature dependency graph. This method should increase our ability to re-use results of test cases across successive products in the family and reduce testing effort. I report the results of a case study involving several non-trivial SPLs and show that for these objects, the FIG Basis Path method is as effective as testing all products, but requires us to test no more than 24% of the products in the SPL.