1 resultado para use value
em Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (17)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (28)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (26)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (11)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (57)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (7)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (77)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (14)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (2)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (3)
- Ecology and Society (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (11)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (41)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (12)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia - Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (52)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (141)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (30)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (6)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (17)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (9)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Michigan (156)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (17)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Lying has a complicated relationship with the First Amendment. It is beyond question that some lies – such as perjury or pretending to be a police officer – are not covered by the First Amendment. But it is equally clear that some lies, even intentionally lying about military honors, are entitled to First Amendment protection. U.S. v. Alvarez, 132 S. Ct. 2537 (2012). To date, however, both Supreme Court doctrine and academic commentary has taken for granted that any constitutional protection for lies is purely prophylactic – it protects the liar to avoid chilling truthful speech. This Article is the first to argue, contrary to conventional wisdom, that certain types of lies paradoxically advance the values underlying the First Amendment. Our framework is descriptively novel and doctrinally important insofar as we provide the first comprehensive post-Alvarez look at the wide range of lies that may raise First Amendment issues. Because there was no majority opinion in Alvarez, there is uncertainty about which standard of constitutional scrutiny should apply to protected lies, an issue we examine at length. Moreover, our normative claim is straightforward: when a lie has intrinsic or instrumental value it should be treated differently from other types of lies and warrant the greatest constitutional protection. Specifically, we argue that investigative deceptions – lies used to secure truthful factual information about matters of public concern – deserve the utmost constitutional protection because they advance the underling purposes of free speech: they enhance political discourse, help reveal the truth, and promote individual autonomy. A prototypical investigative deception is the sort of misrepresentation required in order for an undercover journalist, investigator, or activist to gain access to information or images of great political significance that would not be available if the investigator disclosed her reporting or political objectives. Tactical use of such lies have a long history in American journalism and activism, from Upton Sinclair to his modern day heirs. Using the proliferation of anti-whistleblower statutes like Ag Gag laws as an illustrative example, we argue that investigative deceptions are a category of high value lies that ought to receive rigorous protection under the First Amendment. At the same time, we recognize that not all lies are alike and that in other areas, the government regulation of lies serves legitimate interests. We therefore conclude the Article by drawing some limiting principles to our theory.