2 resultados para mixed-model assembly

em Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The accumulation of microtubule-associated protein tau into fibrillar aggregates is the hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders, collectively referred to as tauopathies. Fibrils can propagate from one cell to the next and spread throughout the brain. However, a study shows that only small aggregates can be taken up by cultured neuronal cells. The mechanisms that lead to the breakage of fibrils into smaller fragments remain unknown. In yeast, the AAA+ chaperone HSP104 processes the reactivation of protein aggregates and is responsible for fragmentation of fibrils. This study focused on investigating the effects of molecular chaperones on tau fibrils and using HSP104 as a model system to test whether we can monitor fibril fracturing. The assays used to detect the chaperone’s actions on tau utilized acrylodan fluorescence, thioflavin T fluorescence, and sedimentation. Tau fibrils were either formed with a cofactor, heparin, to accelerate assembly or without a cofactor. In the process of investigating the effects of HSP104 on tau fibrils, this study established an assay to determine the effects of breakage on the seeding properties of tau fibrils. Our findings demonstrated that the sonication of tau fibrils produces smaller fragments (seeds) that accelerate the conversion of monomeric tau into fibrils. The use of this assay with HSP104 provided evidence that HSP104 inhibits the elongation of tau fibrils. Indeed, HSP104 inhibits the aggregation of soluble tau into aggregates. However, tau fibril breakage and dissociation were not observed with HSP104, either alone or in combination with co-chaperones (HSP70 and HSP40). Our findings provide insights into the seeding properties of tau fibrils, and suggest that fragmentation is a critical part of tau assembly. This knowledge should be valuable for understanding tau fibril aggregation and propagation in the brain, which is necessary to identify new treatments for neurodegenerative diseases.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

As world communication, technology, and trade become increasingly integrated through globalization, multinational corporations seek employees with global leadership experience and skills. However, the demand for these skills currently outweighs the supply. Given the rarity of globally ready leaders, global competency development should be emphasized in higher education programs. The reality, however, is that university graduate programs are often outdated and focus mostly on cognitive learning. Global leadership competence requires moving beyond the cognitive domain of learning to create socially responsible and culturally connected global leaders. This requires attention to development methods; however, limited research in global leadership development methods has been conducted. A new conceptual model, the global leadership development ecosystem, was introduced in this study to guide the design and evaluation of global leadership development programs. It was based on three theories of learning and was divided into four development methodologies. This study quantitatively tested the model and used it as a framework for an in-depth examination of the design of one International MBA program. The program was first benchmarked, by means of a qualitative best practices analysis, against the top-ranking IMBA programs in the world. Qualitative data from students, faculty, administrators, and staff was then examined, using descriptive and focused data coding. Quantitative data analysis, using PASW Statistics software, and a hierarchical regression, showed the individual effect of each of the four development methods, as well as their combined effect, on student scores on a global leadership assessment. The analysis revealed that each methodology played a distinct and important role in developing different competencies of global leadership. It also confirmed the critical link between self-efficacy and global leadership development.