1 resultado para Why we fight
em Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (10)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (3)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (17)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (43)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (3)
- CamPuce - an association for the promotion of science and humanities in African Countries (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (26)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (5)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (64)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Peer Publishing (4)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Duke University (8)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Escola Superior de Educação de Paula Frassinetti (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (11)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (6)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (32)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (367)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (15)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (19)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (14)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (7)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (15)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (8)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (12)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
This Article uses the example of BigLaw firms to explore the challenges that many elite organizations face in providing equal opportunity to their workers. Despite good intentions and the investment of significant resources, large law firms have been consistently unable to deliver diverse partnership structures - especially in more senior positions of power. Building on implicit and institutional bias scholarship and on successful approaches described in the organizational behavior literature, we argue that a significant barrier to systemic diversity at the law firm partnership level has been, paradoxically, the insistence on difference blindness standards that seek to evaluate each person on their individual merit. While powerful in dismantling intentional discrimination, these standards rely on an assumption that lawyers are, and have the power to act as, atomistic individuals - a dangerous assumption that has been disproven consistently by the literature establishing the continuing and powerful influence of implicit and institutional bias. Accordingly, difference blindness, which holds all lawyers accountable to seemingly neutral standards, disproportionately disadvantages diverse populations and normalizes the dominance of certain actors - here, white men - by creating the illusion that success or failure depends upon individual rather than structural constraints. In contrast, we argue that a bias awareness approach that encourages identity awareness and a relational framework is a more promising way to promote equality, equity, and inclusion.