1 resultado para United States. Army Materiel Command
em Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (6)
- Aquatic Commons (112)
- Archive of European Integration (39)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (23)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Brock University, Canada (92)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (13)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (30)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (6)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (103)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (5)
- Digital Howard @ Howard University | Howard University Research (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (31)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (8)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (6)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (19)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (7)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (53)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (57)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (8)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (7)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (7)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (18)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Connecticut - USA (9)
- University of Michigan (205)
- University of Washington (1)
- USA Library of Congress (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
The United States and the European Union each have their own policy approach to protect surface water quality. Both policy approaches are similar in many ways. Both rely heavily on command and control. However, there are differences in the application of the details. Both the U.S. and E.U. began current efforts to protect surface water quality in the 1970s, yet quality continues to less than desired in both places. Both have reduced point source pollutants but have had difficulty controlling non-point source pollutants even though policies have been in place for many decades. The successes and failures of the two policies are studied in this project to determine which aspects of both policies will best protect surface water quality in an increasingly complex future.