1 resultado para Tourism -- Korea (South) -- Planning.
em Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (19)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- Aquatic Commons (19)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- Australian Council for Educational Research (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (13)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (17)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (5)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (9)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (15)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- Duke University (6)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Harvard University (9)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (6)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (19)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (17)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (489)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (10)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (4)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (19)
- Universidad de Alicante (8)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (11)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Michigan (17)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (66)
- University of Washington (4)
- USA Library of Congress (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
Resumo:
Environmental degradation from point and non-point source pollution in the past ten years has made it increasingly clear that threats to aquatic resources cannot adequately be addressed without a more integrated watershed approach to the management. Through comprehensive, qualitative interviews of experts in the watershed approach in South Carolina, recommendations will be made to improve this holistic process. Conducting interviews to compile institutional knowledge on the incentives and barriers from professionals working within the watershed approach will show how managing the natural resources in South Carolina could be more effective and efficient. By gathering experiences of lessons learned, best approach techniques, and suggestions for future watershed planning, several recommendations were made to further the use of the watershed approach in South Carolina.