1 resultado para Supply chain regulations
em Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (12)
- AMS Campus - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (16)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (184)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (9)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (9)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (65)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (18)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (16)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (267)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (14)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (3)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (4)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (19)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (30)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (28)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (13)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (91)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universidade do Minho (8)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (6)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (7)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (6)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Product manufacturers face increasing environmental and human health regulations with certain regulations targeting specific chemicals of concern that must be removed from the supply chain. This study examines a green chemistry approach to choosing between flame retardant alternatives in electronic products during the design phase of product development. An aggregated score based on five criteria was generated for each flame retardant. To address subjectivity and cognitive bias concerns probabilistic sensitivity analysis was applied to the weighting factors used to generate the scores to examine the reliability of the results. The highest scoring flame retardants based on the comprehensive green chemistry approach were different from the flame retardants chosen using cost as the primary selection criteria.