1 resultado para Mine ventilation.
em Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (4)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (24)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (20)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (5)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (60)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (48)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (90)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (3)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (22)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (40)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (17)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Duke University (3)
- Earth Simulator Research Results Repository (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (6)
- Harvard University (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (8)
- Instituto de Engenharia Nuclear, Brazil - Carpe dIEN (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Memorial University Research Repository (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (14)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (29)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (95)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (72)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (35)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (19)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (8)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (2)
- University of Michigan (154)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (140)
Resumo:
Abandoned mine land cleanups are limited by restrictive regulations, inconsistent and unavailable funds, and a lack of adequate protections for stakeholders attempting to improve site conditions. This study evaluated examples of two cleanup mechanisms: an EPA-lead CERCLA cleanup and a state-lead, stakeholder-funded approach. The case studies showed that CERCLA provides the most comprehensive funding mechanism for abandoned mine cleanups while offering very little flexibility. State-lead programs allow for more flexibility, yet states are bound by federal laws and are hampered by lack of funding. Case analysis determined that any new approach should provide adequate funding, be flexible in its cleanup criteria, and minimize liability for those undertaking cleanups. It must also protect human health and promote natural ecological recovery.