1 resultado para Contrast echocardiography
em Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- ARCA - Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (62)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (20)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (239)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (143)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (18)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (9)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- Duke University (2)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (2)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (3)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (51)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (6)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (20)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (61)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (4)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (105)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Michigan (17)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (131)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
Resumo:
The United States and the European Union each have their own policy approach to protect surface water quality. Both policy approaches are similar in many ways. Both rely heavily on command and control. However, there are differences in the application of the details. Both the U.S. and E.U. began current efforts to protect surface water quality in the 1970s, yet quality continues to less than desired in both places. Both have reduced point source pollutants but have had difficulty controlling non-point source pollutants even though policies have been in place for many decades. The successes and failures of the two policies are studied in this project to determine which aspects of both policies will best protect surface water quality in an increasingly complex future.