1 resultado para Contrast Gain-control
em Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research
Filtro por publicador
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (56)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (329)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (30)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (19)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (9)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (10)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (7)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Helvia: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Córdoba (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (30)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (28)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (55)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad EAFIT - Medelin - Colombia (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (5)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (29)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (13)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade do Minho (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (46)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (6)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (194)
- University of Washington (3)
Resumo:
The United States and the European Union each have their own policy approach to protect surface water quality. Both policy approaches are similar in many ways. Both rely heavily on command and control. However, there are differences in the application of the details. Both the U.S. and E.U. began current efforts to protect surface water quality in the 1970s, yet quality continues to less than desired in both places. Both have reduced point source pollutants but have had difficulty controlling non-point source pollutants even though policies have been in place for many decades. The successes and failures of the two policies are studied in this project to determine which aspects of both policies will best protect surface water quality in an increasingly complex future.