1 resultado para CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING
em Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (18)
- Aston University Research Archive (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (99)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (12)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (5)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (41)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (40)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (7)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (15)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Duke University (10)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (7)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (6)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (6)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (126)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (196)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (8)
- Repositório Digital da Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul - USCS (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (14)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (4)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (22)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (6)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (4)
Resumo:
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 strengthen roles of the community in the CERCLA process. Many layers of bureaucracy and the complexity of regulations make the implementation and enforcement of environmental policy a burdensome process. Local government, the public and private corporations have a critical role in the CERCLA decision-making process by implementing a comprehensive public participation process. This paper examines a case study in which a local Colorado health department implemented a successful public participation process in order to positively affect the remediation decision-making process.