1 resultado para reporting guideline
em DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (2)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (5)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (9)
- Aston University Research Archive (89)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (10)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (6)
- Bioline International (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (127)
- Brock University, Canada (8)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (26)
- Centro Hospitalar do Porto (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (9)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (4)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (11)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (39)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (4)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (10)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (26)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (7)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (4)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (7)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (20)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Scielo España (4)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (19)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (8)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (48)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Michigan (135)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (68)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Hyponatraemia, defined as a serum sodium concentration <135 mmol/l, is the most common disorder of body fuid and electrolyte balance encountered in clinical practice. It can lead to a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms, from subtle to severe or even life threatening, and is associated with increased mortality, morbidity and length of hospital stay in patients presenting with a range of conditions. Despite this, the management of patients remains problematic. The prevalence of hyponatraemia in widely different conditions and the fact that hyponatraemia is managed by clinicians with a broad variety of backgrounds have fostered diverse institution-and speciality-based approaches to diagnosis and treatment. To obtain a common and holistic view, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), the European Society of Endocrinology (ESE) and the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA), represented by European Renal Best Practice (ERBP), have developed the Clinical Practice Guideline on the diagnostic approach and treatment of hyponatraemia as a joint venture of three societies representing specialists with a natural interest in hyponatraemia. In addition to a rigorous approach to methodology and evaluation, we were keen to ensure that the document focused on patient-important outcomes and included utility for clinicians involved in everyday practice.