1 resultado para content management
em DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (6)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (23)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (24)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (8)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (10)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (30)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (8)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (83)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (7)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- Duke University (3)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (10)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Hospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca - Portugal (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (7)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (8)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (15)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (463)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (25)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (30)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (5)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (11)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (3)
Resumo:
Objective Describe the methodology and selection of quality indicators (QI) to be implemented in the EFFECT (EFFectiveness of Endometrial Cancer Treatment) project. EFFECT aims to monitor the variability in Quality of Care (QoC) of uterine cancer in Belgium, to compare the effectiveness of different treatment strategies to improve the QoC and to check the internal validity of the QI to validate the impact of process indicators on outcome. Methods A QI list was retrieved from literature, recent guidelines and QI databases. The Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Center methodology was used for the selection process and involved an expert's panel rating the QI on 4 criteria. The resulting scores and further discussion resulted in a final QI list. An online EFFECT module was developed by the Belgian Cancer Registry including the list of variables required for measuring the QI. Three test phases were performed to evaluate the relevance, feasibility and understanding of the variables and to test the compatibility of the dataset. Results 138 QI were considered for further discussion and 82 QI were eligible for rating. Based on the rating scores and consensus among the expert's panel, 41 QI were considered measurable and relevant. Testing of the data collection enabled optimization of the content and the user-friendliness of the dataset and online module. Conclusions This first Belgian initiative for monitoring the QoC of uterine cancer indicates that the previously used QI selection methodology is reproducible for uterine cancer. The QI list could be applied by other research groups for comparison. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.