1 resultado para TCP-friendliness
em DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (4)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Campus - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (37)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (4)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (18)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (23)
- Boston University Digital Common (47)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (9)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (4)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (42)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (4)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (14)
- Hospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca - Portugal (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (52)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (16)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (27)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (77)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (3)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (5)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de El Salvador (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (50)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (3)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (250)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (16)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (9)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Michigan (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (18)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Objective Describe the methodology and selection of quality indicators (QI) to be implemented in the EFFECT (EFFectiveness of Endometrial Cancer Treatment) project. EFFECT aims to monitor the variability in Quality of Care (QoC) of uterine cancer in Belgium, to compare the effectiveness of different treatment strategies to improve the QoC and to check the internal validity of the QI to validate the impact of process indicators on outcome. Methods A QI list was retrieved from literature, recent guidelines and QI databases. The Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Center methodology was used for the selection process and involved an expert's panel rating the QI on 4 criteria. The resulting scores and further discussion resulted in a final QI list. An online EFFECT module was developed by the Belgian Cancer Registry including the list of variables required for measuring the QI. Three test phases were performed to evaluate the relevance, feasibility and understanding of the variables and to test the compatibility of the dataset. Results 138 QI were considered for further discussion and 82 QI were eligible for rating. Based on the rating scores and consensus among the expert's panel, 41 QI were considered measurable and relevant. Testing of the data collection enabled optimization of the content and the user-friendliness of the dataset and online module. Conclusions This first Belgian initiative for monitoring the QoC of uterine cancer indicates that the previously used QI selection methodology is reproducible for uterine cancer. The QI list could be applied by other research groups for comparison. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.