1 resultado para Property Law (Mortgagor Protection) Amendment Act 2008 (Qld)
em DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (41)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (6)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Aston University Research Archive (26)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (10)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (10)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (19)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (36)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (597)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (5)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Université de Montréal (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (12)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Innsbruck Digital Library - Austria (1)
- University of Michigan (27)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
We compare patent litigation cases across four European jurisdictions – Germany, France, the Netherlands, and the UK – covering cases filed during the period 2000-2008. For our analysis, we assemble a new dataset that contains detailed information at the case, litigant, and patent level for patent cases filed at the major courts in the four jurisdictions. We find substantial differences across jurisdictions in terms of case loads. Courts in Germany hear by far the largest number of cases in absolute terms, but also when taking country size into account. We also find important between-country differences in terms of outcomes, the share of cases that is appealed, as well as the characteristics of litigants and litigated patents. A considerable number of patents are litigated in multiple jurisdictions, but the majority of patents are subject to litigation only in one of the four jurisdictions.