1 resultado para Check-In
em DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (13)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- Aquatic Commons (11)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (4)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (2)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (7)
- Aston University Research Archive (42)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (15)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (2)
- Bioline International (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (36)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Brunel University (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (4)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (10)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (13)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (10)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (5)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (8)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (13)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Harvard University (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (26)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (7)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (7)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (21)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (273)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (88)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- Scielo España (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (30)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (71)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (6)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Objective Describe the methodology and selection of quality indicators (QI) to be implemented in the EFFECT (EFFectiveness of Endometrial Cancer Treatment) project. EFFECT aims to monitor the variability in Quality of Care (QoC) of uterine cancer in Belgium, to compare the effectiveness of different treatment strategies to improve the QoC and to check the internal validity of the QI to validate the impact of process indicators on outcome. Methods A QI list was retrieved from literature, recent guidelines and QI databases. The Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Center methodology was used for the selection process and involved an expert's panel rating the QI on 4 criteria. The resulting scores and further discussion resulted in a final QI list. An online EFFECT module was developed by the Belgian Cancer Registry including the list of variables required for measuring the QI. Three test phases were performed to evaluate the relevance, feasibility and understanding of the variables and to test the compatibility of the dataset. Results 138 QI were considered for further discussion and 82 QI were eligible for rating. Based on the rating scores and consensus among the expert's panel, 41 QI were considered measurable and relevant. Testing of the data collection enabled optimization of the content and the user-friendliness of the dataset and online module. Conclusions This first Belgian initiative for monitoring the QoC of uterine cancer indicates that the previously used QI selection methodology is reproducible for uterine cancer. The QI list could be applied by other research groups for comparison. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.