1 resultado para Check list ISO
em DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (3)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (17)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (3)
- Aquatic Commons (22)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (12)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (15)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (25)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (75)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá, Colombia (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (15)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (17)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (11)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (21)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (43)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (3)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (9)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Harvard University (3)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (7)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Leiria (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (13)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (11)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (17)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (81)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (27)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (41)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (11)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (156)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (17)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (3)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (18)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (12)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (8)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (23)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Michigan (63)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (26)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Objective Describe the methodology and selection of quality indicators (QI) to be implemented in the EFFECT (EFFectiveness of Endometrial Cancer Treatment) project. EFFECT aims to monitor the variability in Quality of Care (QoC) of uterine cancer in Belgium, to compare the effectiveness of different treatment strategies to improve the QoC and to check the internal validity of the QI to validate the impact of process indicators on outcome. Methods A QI list was retrieved from literature, recent guidelines and QI databases. The Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Center methodology was used for the selection process and involved an expert's panel rating the QI on 4 criteria. The resulting scores and further discussion resulted in a final QI list. An online EFFECT module was developed by the Belgian Cancer Registry including the list of variables required for measuring the QI. Three test phases were performed to evaluate the relevance, feasibility and understanding of the variables and to test the compatibility of the dataset. Results 138 QI were considered for further discussion and 82 QI were eligible for rating. Based on the rating scores and consensus among the expert's panel, 41 QI were considered measurable and relevant. Testing of the data collection enabled optimization of the content and the user-friendliness of the dataset and online module. Conclusions This first Belgian initiative for monitoring the QoC of uterine cancer indicates that the previously used QI selection methodology is reproducible for uterine cancer. The QI list could be applied by other research groups for comparison. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.