Plasma kinetic theory

Kinetic theory studies the macroscopic properties of large numbers of particles, starting from their (classical) equations of motion while the thermodynamics describes the equilibrium behavior of macroscopic objects in terms of concepts such as work, heat, and entropy. The phenomenological laws of thermodynamics tell us how these quantities are constrained as a system approaches its equilibrium. At the microscopic level, we know that these systems are composed of particles (atoms, particles), whose interactions and dynamics are reasonably well understood in terms of more fundamental theories. If these microscopic descriptions are complete, we should be able to account for the macroscopic behavior, i.e. derive the laws governing the macroscopic state functions in equilibrium. Kinetic theory attempts to achieve this objective. In particular, we shall try to answer the following questions [1]: How can we define equilibrium for a system of moving particles? Do all systems naturally evolve towards an equilibrium state? What is the time evolution of a system that is not quite in equilibrium?

Decomposition, recomposition, speculation: The contribution of the Treatise of Choisy for the architectural survey, a pedagogical approach

info:eu-repo/semantics/inPress

Frei Otto et René Sarger: entre idéaux d’architecte et vérité d’ingénieur

À travers leurs premiers écrits des années 50 et 60, Frei Otto, architecte et ingénieur allemand (1925-2015), et René Sarger (1917-1988), architecte français, n’expriment pas seulement une passion partagée des toitures suspendues. Partant du même souci d’une forme structurale « juste », leurs convictions radicales révèlent aussi les premiers questionnements des nouveaux rôles de l’ingénieur et de l’architecte de l’époque, mais aussi des idéaux opposés concernant leur position comme concepteurs et auteurs du monde bâti, ainsi que l’importance sociétale de leurs disciplines.

Violence Exposure and Welfare over Time: Evidence from the Burundi Civil War

We investigate the relationship between exposure to conflict and poverty dynamics over time, using original three-waves panel data for Burundi which tracked individuals and reported local-level violence exposure from 1998 to 2012. Firstly, the data reveal that headcount poverty has not changed since 1998 while we observe multiple transitions into and out of poverty. Moreover, households exposed to the war exhibit a lower level of welfare than non-exposed households, with the difference between the two groups predicted to remain significant at least until 2017, i.e. twelve years after the conflict termination. The correlation between violence exposure and deprivation over time is confirmed in a household-level panel setting. Secondly, our empirical investigation shows how violence exposure over different time spans interacts with households' subsequent welfare. Our analysis of the determinants of households' likelihood to switch poverty status (i.e. to fall into poverty or escape poverty) combined with quantile regressions suggest that, (i) exposure during the first phase of the conflict has affected the entire distribution, and (ii) exposure during the second phase of the conflict has mostly affected the upper tail of the distribution: initially non-poor households have a higher propensity to fall into poverty while initially poor households see their propensity to pull through only slightly decrease with recent exposure to violence. Although not directly testable with the data at hand, these results are consistent with the changing nature of violence in the course of the Burundi civil war, from relatively more labour-destructive to relatively more capital-destructive.