The effect of exemestane on serum lipid profile in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer: a companion study to EORTC Trial 10951, 'Randomized phase II study in first line hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer with exemestane or tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients'.

BACKGROUND: The impact of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) on non-cancer-related outcomes, which are known to be affected by oestrogens, has become increasingly important in postmenopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer. So far, data related to the effect of AIs on lipid profile in postmenopausal women is scarce. This study, as a companion substudy of an EORTC phase II trial (10951), evaluated the impact of exemestane, a steroidal aromatase inactivator, on the lipid profile of postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The EORTC trial 10951 randomised 122 postmenopausal breast cancer patients to exemestane (E) 25 mg (n = 62) or tamoxifen (T) 20 mg (n = 60) once daily as a first-line treatment in the metastatic setting. Exemestane showed promising results in all the primary efficacy end points of the trial (response rate, clinical benefit rate and response duration), and it was well tolerated with low incidence of serious toxicity. As a secondary end point of this phase II trial, serum triglycerides (TRG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), total cholesterol (TC), lipoprotein a (Lip a), and apolipoproteins (Apo) B and A1 were measured at baseline and while on therapy (at 8, 24 and 48 weeks) to assess the impact of exemestane and tamoxifen on serum lipid profiles. Of the 122 randomised patients, those who had baseline and at least one other lipid assessment are included in the present analysis. The patients who received concomitant drugs that could affect lipid profile are included only if these drugs were administered throughout the study treatment. Increase or decrease in lipid parameters within 20% of baseline were considered as non-significant and thus unchanged. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (36 in both arms) were included in the statistical analysis. The majority of patients had abnormal TC and normal TRG, HDL, Apo A1, Apo B and Lip a levels at baseline. Neither exemestane nor tamoxifen had adverse effects on TC, HDL, Apo A1, Apo B or Lip a levels at 8, 24 and 48 weeks of treatment. Exemestane and tamoxifen had opposite effects on TRG levels: exemestane lowered while tamoxifen increased TRG levels over time. There were too few patients with normal baseline TC and abnormal TRG, HDL, Apo A1, Apo B and Lip a levels to allow for assessment of E's impact on these subsets. The atherogenic risk determined by Apo A1:Apo B and TC:HDL ratios remained unchanged throughout the treatment period in both the E and T arms. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, exemestane has no detrimental effect on cholesterol levels and the atherogenic indices, which are well-known risk factors for coronary artery disease. In addition, it has a beneficial effect on TRG levels. These data, coupled with E's excellent efficacy and tolerability, support further exploration of its potential in the metastatic, adjuvant and chemopreventive setting.

Stimulation of apolipoprotein D secretion by steroids coincides with inhibition of cell proliferation in human LNCaP prostate cancer cells

Although steroid hormones are known to play a predominant role in the regulation of cell growth in hormone-sensitive cancers, their mechanisms of action, especially their interaction with growth factors and/or growth inhibitors, is poorly understood. We have recently observed that the effects of androgens and estrogens on the expression of the major protein found in human breast gross cystic disease fluid, protein-24, are opposite to their respective action on cell proliferation in human breast cancer cell lines. Somewhat surprisingly, the recent elucidation of the amino acid sequence of this progesterone binding protein reveals that this tumor marker is apolipoprotein D (apo D), a member of a superfamily of lipophilic ligand carrier proteins. The present study was designed to determine whether apo D is secreted by human prostate cancer cells and could thus be a new marker of steroid action in these cancer cells, and whether the sex steroid-induced stimulation of apo D secretion coincides with inhibition of cell proliferation. We took advantage of the biphasic pattern of the effect of steroids on the proliferation of the human prostate cancer LNCaP cell line, which offers the opportunity to discriminate between positive and negative steroid receptor-regulated cell growth processes. A 10-day exposure to low concentrations of dihydrotestosterone and testosterone caused a potent stimulation of LNCaP cell proliferation, whereas incubation with higher concentrations of these androgens led to a progressive decrease in cell proliferation towards basal levels. The biphasic action of androgens was also observed on apo D secretion, the effects on apo D secretion being inversely related to their action on LNCaP cell proliferation. Similar opposite biphasic effects were also observed with 9 other steroids, thus indicating that the stimulation of secretion of this new biochemical marker coincides with inhibition of cell proliferation in LNCaP human prostatic cancer cells.