1 resultado para 300705 Evaluation of Management Strategies
em DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (4)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (3)
- Academic Archive On-line (Karlstad University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (49)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archimer: Archive de l'Institut francais de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer (1)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (35)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (17)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (29)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (8)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (39)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (6)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (6)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (109)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (5)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (5)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (11)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (10)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (25)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (31)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (6)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (16)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (54)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (147)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (37)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (22)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (5)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (49)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (55)
- University of Washington (9)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Objective Describe the methodology and selection of quality indicators (QI) to be implemented in the EFFECT (EFFectiveness of Endometrial Cancer Treatment) project. EFFECT aims to monitor the variability in Quality of Care (QoC) of uterine cancer in Belgium, to compare the effectiveness of different treatment strategies to improve the QoC and to check the internal validity of the QI to validate the impact of process indicators on outcome. Methods A QI list was retrieved from literature, recent guidelines and QI databases. The Belgian Healthcare Knowledge Center methodology was used for the selection process and involved an expert's panel rating the QI on 4 criteria. The resulting scores and further discussion resulted in a final QI list. An online EFFECT module was developed by the Belgian Cancer Registry including the list of variables required for measuring the QI. Three test phases were performed to evaluate the relevance, feasibility and understanding of the variables and to test the compatibility of the dataset. Results 138 QI were considered for further discussion and 82 QI were eligible for rating. Based on the rating scores and consensus among the expert's panel, 41 QI were considered measurable and relevant. Testing of the data collection enabled optimization of the content and the user-friendliness of the dataset and online module. Conclusions This first Belgian initiative for monitoring the QoC of uterine cancer indicates that the previously used QI selection methodology is reproducible for uterine cancer. The QI list could be applied by other research groups for comparison. © 2013 Elsevier Inc.