Peanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): validation of eliciting doses using a novel single-dose challenge protocol

Background: The eliciting dose (ED) for a peanut allergic reaction in 5% of the peanut allergic population, the ED05, is 1.5 mg of peanut protein. This ED05 was derived from oral food challenges (OFC) that use graded, incremental doses administered at fixed time intervals. Individual patients’ threshold doses were used to generate population dose-distribution curves using probability distributions from which the ED05 was then determined. It is important to clinically validate that this dose is predictive of the allergenic response in a further unselected group of peanut-allergic individuals. Methods/Aims: This is a multi-centre study involving three national level referral and teaching centres. (Cork University Hospital, Ireland, Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, Australia and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, U.S.A.) The study is now in process and will continue to run until all centres have recruited 125 participates in each respective centre. A total of 375 participants, aged 1–18 years will be recruited during routine Allergy appointments in the centres. The aim is to assess the precision of the predicted ED05 using a single dose (6 mg peanut = 1.5 mg of peanut protein) in the form of a cookie. Validated Food Allergy related Quality of Life Questionnaires-(FAQLQ) will be self-administered prior to OFC and 1 month after challenge to assess the impact of a single dose OFC on FAQL. Serological and cell based in vitro studies will be performed. Conclusion: The validation of the ED05 threshold for allergic reactions in peanut allergic subjects has potential value for public health measures. The single dose OFC, based upon the statistical dose-distribution analysis of past challenge trials, promises an efficient approach to identify the most highly sensitive patients within any given food-allergic population.

The ways in which new public management ideas impact upon the administrative culture of 'street-level' bureaucrats and professionals working within Irish social policy

The conventional meaning of culture is ‘widely shared and strongly held values’ of a particular group or society (Bradley and Parker, 2006: 89). Culture is not a rigid concept; it can be influenced or altered by new ideas or forces. This research examines the ways in which one set of ideas in particular, that is, those associated with New Public Management, have impacted upon the administrative culture of 'street-level' bureaucrats and professionals within Irish social policy. Lipsky (1980: 3) defined 'street-level' bureaucrats as ‘public service workers who interact directly with citizens in the course of their jobs, and who have substantial discretion in the execution of their work’. Utilising the Competing Values Framework (CVF) in the analysis of eighty three semi-structured interviews with 'street-level' bureaucrats and professionals, an evaluation is made as to the impact of NPM ideas on both visible and invisible aspects of administrative culture. Overall, the influence of NPM is confined to superficial aspects of administrative culture such as; increased flexibility in working hours and to some degree job contracts; increased time commitment; and a customer service focus. However, the extent of these changes varies depending on policy sector and occupational group. Aspects of consensual and hierarchical cultures remain firmly in place. These coincide with features of developmental and market cultures. Contrary to the view that members of hierarchical and consensual culture would pose resistance to change, this research clearly illustrates that a very large appetite for change exists in the attitudes of 'street-level' bureaucrats and professionals within Irish social policy, with many of them suggesting changes that correspond to NPM ideas. This study demonstrates the relevance of employing the CVF model as it is clear that administrative culture is very much a dynamic system of competing and co-existing cultures.

The role played by angiotensin (1-7) in the regulation of renal haemodynamics and excretory function in anesthetized rats

Initial studies have demonstrated that intra- renal infusion of Ang (1-7) caused a diuresis and natriuresis that was proportional to the degree of activation of the Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS). This raised the question as why the magnitude of this diuresis and natriuresis was compromised in rats receiving a high sodium diet (suppressed RAAS) and enhanced in low sodium fed rats (activated RAAS)? Could the answer lie with changes in intra-renal AT1 or Mas receptor expression? Interestingly, the observed Ang (1-7) induced increases in sodium and water excretion in rats receiving either a low or normal sodium diet were and blocked in the presence of the AT 1 receptor antagonist (Losartan) in the presence of the, 'Mas' receptor antagonist (A-779). These data suggest that both AT1 and 'Mas' receptors need to be functional in order to fully mediate the renal responses to intra-renal Ang (1-7) infusion. Importantly, further experimentation also revealed that there is a proportional relationship between AT 1 receptor expression in the rat renal cortex and the magnitude of the excretory actions of intra renal Ang (1-7) infusion, which is only partially dependent on the level of 'Mas' receptor expression. These observations suggest that although Ang (1-7) induced increases in sodium and water excretion are mediated by the Mas receptor, the magnitude of these excretory responses appear to be dependent upon the level of AT 1 receptor expression and more specifically Ang II/ AT 1 receptor signalling. Thus in rats receiving a low sodium diet, Ang (1-7) acts via the Mas receptor to inhibit Ang II/ AT 1 receptor signalling. In rats receiving a high sodium diet the down regulated AT 1 receptor expression implies a reduction in Ang II/ AT 1 receptor signalling which renders the counter-regulatory effects of intra-renal Ang (1-7) infusion redundant.