2 resultados para cross-talk
em CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland
Resumo:
Background: The role of Fas (CD95) and its ligand, Fas ligand (FasL/CD95L), is poorly understood in the intestine. Whilst Fas is best studies in terms of its function in apoptosis, recent studies suggest that Fas ligation may mediate additional, non-apoptotic functions such as inflammation. Toll like Receptors (TLRs) play an important role in mediating inflammation and homeostasis in the intestine. Recent studies have shown that a level of crosstalk exists between the Fas and TLR signalling pathways but this has not yet been investigated in the intestine. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate potential cross-talk between TLRs and Fas/FasL system in intestinal cancer cells. Results: Treatment with TLR4 and TLR5 ligands, but not ligands for TLR2 and TLR9 increased the expression of Fas and FasL in intestinal cancer cells in vitro. Consistent with this, expression of Fas and FasL was reduced in the distal colon tissue from germ-free (GF), TLR4 and TLR5 knock-out (KO) mice but was unchanged in TLR2KO tissue, suggesting that intestinal cancer cells display a degree of specificity in their ability to upregulate Fas and FasL expression in response to TLR ligation. Expression of both Fas and FasL was significantly reduced in TRIF KO tissue, indicating that signalling via TRIF by TLR4 and TLR5 agonists may be responsible for the induction of Fas and FasL expression in intestinal cancer cells. In addition, modulating Fas signalling using agonistic anti-Fas augmented TLR4 and TLR5-mediated tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and interleukin 8 (IL)-8 production by intestinal cancer cells, suggesting crosstalk occurs between these receptors in these cells. Furthermore, suppression of Fas in intestinal cancer cells reduced the ability of the intestinal pathogens, Salmonella typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes to induce the expression of IL-8, suggesting that Fas signalling may play a role in intestinal host defence against pathogens. Inflammation is known to be important in colon tumourigenesis and Fas signalling on intestinal cancer cells has been shown to result in the production of inflammatory mediators. Fas-mediated signalling may therefore play a role in colon cancer development. Suppression of tumour-derived Fas by 85% led to a reduction in the tumour volume and changes in tumour infiltrating macrophages and neutrophils. TLR4 signalling has been shown to play a role in colon cancer via the recruitment and activation of alternatively activated immune cells. Given the crosstalk seen between Fas and TLR4 signalling in intestinal cancer cells in vitro, suppressing Fas signalling may enhance the efficacy of TLR4 antagonism in vivo. TLR4 antagonism resulted in smaller tumours with fewer infiltrating neutrophils. Whilst Fas downregulation did not significantly augment the ability of TLR4 antagonism to reduce the final tumour volume, Fas suppression may augment the anti-tumour effects of TLR4 antagonism as neutrophil infiltration was further reduced upon combinatorial treatment. Conclusion: Together, this study demonstrates evidence of a new role for Fas in the intestinal immune response and that manipulating Fas signalling has potential anti-tumour benefit.
Resumo:
Background/Aim: It has been demonstrated that a number of pathologies occur as a result of dysregulation of the immune system. Whilst classically associated with apoptosis, the Fas (CD95) signalling pathway plays a role in inflammation. Studies have demonstrated that Fas activation augments TLR4-mediated MyD88-dependent cytokine production. Studies have also shown that the Fas adapter protein FADD is required for RIG-I-induced IFNβ production. As a similar signalling pathway exists between RIG-I, TLR3 and the MyD88- independent of TLR4, we hypothesised that Fas activation may modulate both TLR3- and TLR4-induced cytokine production. Results: Fas activation reduced poly I:C-induced IFNβ, IL-8, IL-10 and TNFα production whilst augmenting poly I:C-, poly A:U- and Sendai virus-induced IP-10 production. TLR3-, RIG-I- and MDA5-induced IP-10 luciferase activation were inhibited by the Fas adapter protein FADD using overexpression studies. Poly I:C-induced phosphorylation of p-38 and JNK MAPK were reduced by Fas activation. Overexpression of FADD induced AP-1 luciferase activation. Point mutations in the AP-1 binding site enhanced poly I:C-induced IP- 10 production. LPS-induced IL-10, IL-12, IL-8 and TNFα production were enhanced by Fas activation, whilst reducing LPS-induced IFNβ production. Absence of FADD using FADD-/- MEFs resulted in impaired IFNβ production. Overexpression studies using FADD augmented TLR4-, MyD88- and TRIF-induced IFNβ luciferase activation. Overexpression studies also suggested that enhanced TLR4-induced IFNβ production was independent of NFκB activation. Conclusion: Viral-induced IP-10 production is augmented by Fas activation by reducing the phosphorylation of p-38 and JNK MAPKs, modulating AP-1 activation. The Fas adapterprotein FADD is required for TLR4-induced IFNβ production. Studies presented here demonstrate that the Fas signalling pathway can therefore modulate the immune response. Our data demonstrates that this modulatory effect is mediated by its adapter protein FADD, tailoring the immune response by acting as a molecular switch. This ensures the appropriate immune response is mounted, thus preventing an exacerbated immune response.