Statistical considerations in the kinetic analysis of PET-FDG brain tumour studies

Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) imaging can be used to track the distribution of injected radio-labelled molecules over time in vivo. This is a powerful technique, which provides researchers and clinicians the opportunity to study the status of healthy and pathological tissue by examining how it processes substances of interest. Widely used tracers include 18F-uorodeoxyglucose, an analog of glucose, which is used as the radiotracer in over ninety percent of PET scans. This radiotracer provides a way of quantifying the distribution of glucose utilisation in vivo. The interpretation of PET time-course data is complicated because the measured signal is a combination of vascular delivery and tissue retention effects. If the arterial time-course is known, the tissue time-course can typically be expressed in terms of a linear convolution between the arterial time-course and the tissue residue function. As the residue represents the amount of tracer remaining in the tissue, this can be thought of as a survival function; these functions been examined in great detail by the statistics community. Kinetic analysis of PET data is concerned with estimation of the residue and associated functionals such as ow, ux and volume of distribution. This thesis presents a Markov chain formulation of blood tissue exchange and explores how this relates to established compartmental forms. A nonparametric approach to the estimation of the residue is examined and the improvement in this model relative to compartmental model is evaluated using simulations and cross-validation techniques. The reference distribution of the test statistics, generated in comparing the models, is also studied. We explore these models further with simulated studies and an FDG-PET dataset from subjects with gliomas, which has previously been analysed with compartmental modelling. We also consider the performance of a recently proposed mixture modelling technique in this study.

To what extent does the Health Professions Admission Test-Ireland predict performance in early undergraduate tests of communication and clinical skills? – An observational cohort study

Background: Internationally, tests of general mental ability are used in the selection of medical students. Examples include the Medical College Admission Test, Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test and the UK Clinical Aptitude Test. The most widely used measure of their efficacy is predictive validity.A new tool, the Health Professions Admission Test- Ireland (HPAT-Ireland), was introduced in 2009. Traditionally, selection to Irish undergraduate medical schools relied on academic achievement. Since 2009, Irish and EU applicants are selected on a combination of their secondary school academic record (measured predominately by the Leaving Certificate Examination) and HPAT-Ireland score. This is the first study to report on the predictive validity of the HPAT-Ireland for early undergraduate assessments of communication and clinical skills. Method. Students enrolled at two Irish medical schools in 2009 were followed up for two years. Data collected were gender, HPAT-Ireland total and subsection scores; Leaving Certificate Examination plus HPAT-Ireland combined score, Year 1 Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) scores (Total score, communication and clinical subtest scores), Year 1 Multiple Choice Questions and Year 2 OSCE and subset scores. We report descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients and Multiple linear regression models. Results: Data were available for 312 students. In Year 1 none of the selection criteria were significantly related to student OSCE performance. The Leaving Certificate Examination and Leaving Certificate plus HPAT-Ireland combined scores correlated with MCQ marks.In Year 2 a series of significant correlations emerged between the HPAT-Ireland and subsections thereof with OSCE Communication Z-scores; OSCE Clinical Z-scores; and Total OSCE Z-scores. However on multiple regression only the relationship between Total OSCE Score and the Total HPAT-Ireland score remained significant; albeit the predictive power was modest. Conclusion: We found that none of our selection criteria strongly predict clinical and communication skills. The HPAT- Ireland appears to measures ability in domains different to those assessed by the Leaving Certificate Examination. While some significant associations did emerge in Year 2 between HPAT Ireland and total OSCE scores further evaluation is required to establish if this pattern continues during the senior years of the medical course.