1 resultado para Picking
em CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Mid Sweden University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Aquatic Commons (6)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (2)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (5)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (16)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (18)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (8)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (6)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (6)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (8)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (10)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (11)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (25)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Michigan (14)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (5)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
The influence of communication technology on group decision-making has been examined in many studies. But the findings are inconsistent. Some studies showed a positive effect on decision quality, other studies have shown that communication technology makes the decision even worse. One possible explanation for these different findings could be the use of different Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) in these studies, with some GDSS better fitting to the given task than others and with different sets of functions. This paper outlines an approach with an information system solely designed to examine the effect of (1) anonymity, (2) voting and (3) blind picking on decision quality, discussion quality and perceived quality of information.