Investigating the role of Fas (CD95) signalling in the modification of innate immune induced inflammation

Background/Aim: It has been demonstrated that a number of pathologies occur as a result of dysregulation of the immune system. Whilst classically associated with apoptosis, the Fas (CD95) signalling pathway plays a role in inflammation. Studies have demonstrated that Fas activation augments TLR4-mediated MyD88-dependent cytokine production. Studies have also shown that the Fas adapter protein FADD is required for RIG-I-induced IFNβ production. As a similar signalling pathway exists between RIG-I, TLR3 and the MyD88- independent of TLR4, we hypothesised that Fas activation may modulate both TLR3- and TLR4-induced cytokine production. Results: Fas activation reduced poly I:C-induced IFNβ, IL-8, IL-10 and TNFα production whilst augmenting poly I:C-, poly A:U- and Sendai virus-induced IP-10 production. TLR3-, RIG-I- and MDA5-induced IP-10 luciferase activation were inhibited by the Fas adapter protein FADD using overexpression studies. Poly I:C-induced phosphorylation of p-38 and JNK MAPK were reduced by Fas activation. Overexpression of FADD induced AP-1 luciferase activation. Point mutations in the AP-1 binding site enhanced poly I:C-induced IP- 10 production. LPS-induced IL-10, IL-12, IL-8 and TNFα production were enhanced by Fas activation, whilst reducing LPS-induced IFNβ production. Absence of FADD using FADD-/- MEFs resulted in impaired IFNβ production. Overexpression studies using FADD augmented TLR4-, MyD88- and TRIF-induced IFNβ luciferase activation. Overexpression studies also suggested that enhanced TLR4-induced IFNβ production was independent of NFκB activation. Conclusion: Viral-induced IP-10 production is augmented by Fas activation by reducing the phosphorylation of p-38 and JNK MAPKs, modulating AP-1 activation. The Fas adapterprotein FADD is required for TLR4-induced IFNβ production. Studies presented here demonstrate that the Fas signalling pathway can therefore modulate the immune response. Our data demonstrates that this modulatory effect is mediated by its adapter protein FADD, tailoring the immune response by acting as a molecular switch. This ensures the appropriate immune response is mounted, thus preventing an exacerbated immune response.

The knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of patients and their healthcare professionals around oral dosage form modification: a systematic review of the qualitative literature

Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the available qualitative evidence on the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of adult patients, healthcare professionals and carers about oral dosage form modification. Design: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies was undertaken, utilising the thematic synthesis approach. Data sources: The following databases were searched from inception to September 2015: PubMed, Medline (EBSCO), EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest Databases, Scopus, Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). Citation tracking and searching the references lists of included studies was also undertaken. Grey literature was searched using the OpenGrey database, internet searching and personal knowledge. An updated search was undertaken in June 2016. Review methods: Studies meeting the following criteria were eligible for inclusion; (i) used qualitative data collection and analysis methods; (ii) full-text was available in English; (iii) included adult patients who require oral dosage forms to be modified to meet their needs or; (iv) carers or healthcare professionals of patients who require oral dosage forms to be modified. Two reviewers independently appraised the quality of the included studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist. A thematic synthesis was conducted and analytical themes were generated. Results: Of 5455 records screened, seven studies were eligible for inclusion; three involved healthcare professionals and the remaining four studies involved patients. Four analytical themes emerged from the thematic synthesis: (i) patient-centred individuality and variability; (ii) communication; (iii) knowledge and uncertainty and; (iv) complexity. The variability of individual patient’s requirements, poor communication practices and lack of knowledge about oral dosage form modification, when combined with the complex and multi-faceted healthcare environment complicate decision making regarding oral dosage form modification and administration. Conclusions: This systematic review has highlighted the key factors influencing the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of patients and healthcare professionals about oral dosage form modifications. The findings suggest that in order to optimise oral medicine modification practices the needs of individual patients should be routinely and systematically assessed and decision-making should be supported by evidence based recommendations with multidisciplinary input. Further research is needed to optimise oral dosage form modification practices and the factors identified in this review should be considered in the development of future interventions.