1 resultado para Group communication
em CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (16)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (9)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (6)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (51)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- Duke University (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (21)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (6)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (9)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (697)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (9)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (4)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (4)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (27)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
The influence of communication technology on group decision-making has been examined in many studies. But the findings are inconsistent. Some studies showed a positive effect on decision quality, other studies have shown that communication technology makes the decision even worse. One possible explanation for these different findings could be the use of different Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) in these studies, with some GDSS better fitting to the given task than others and with different sets of functions. This paper outlines an approach with an information system solely designed to examine the effect of (1) anonymity, (2) voting and (3) blind picking on decision quality, discussion quality and perceived quality of information.