At what price? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing trial of labour after previous caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery

Background: Elective repeat caesarean delivery (ERCD) rates have been increasing worldwide, thus prompting obstetric discourse on the risks and benefits for the mother and infant. Yet, these increasing rates also have major economic implications for the health care system. Given the dearth of information on the cost-effectiveness related to mode of delivery, the aim of this paper was to perform an economic evaluation on the costs and short-term maternal health consequences associated with a trial of labour after one previous caesarean delivery compared with ERCD for low risk women in Ireland.Methods: Using a decision analytic model, a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed where the measure of health gain was quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a six-week time horizon. A review of international literature was conducted to derive representative estimates of adverse maternal health outcomes following a trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC) and ERCD. Delivery/procedure costs derived from primary data collection and combined both "bottom-up" and "top-down" costing estimations.Results: Maternal morbidities emerged in twice as many cases in the TOLAC group than the ERCD group. However, a TOLAC was found to be the most-effective method of delivery because it was substantially less expensive than ERCD ((sic)1,835.06 versus (sic)4,039.87 per women, respectively), and QALYs were modestly higher (0.84 versus 0.70). Our findings were supported by probabilistic sensitivity analysis.Conclusions: Clinicians need to be well informed of the benefits and risks of TOLAC among low risk women. Ideally, clinician-patient discourse would address differences in length of hospital stay and postpartum recovery time. While it is premature advocate a policy of TOLAC across maternity units, the results of the study prompt further analysis and repeat iterations, encouraging future studies to synthesis previous research and new and relevant evidence under a single comprehensive decision model.

Novel insights into the expression and function of p38δ MAPK in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Oesophageal cancer is an aggressive malignancy which is resistant to conventional therapy and has a poor prognosis. A greater understanding of the underlying molecular biology of oesophageal cancer and the identification of novel targets is necessary for the future treatment of this disease. This thesis focuses specifically on the ill-defined and understudied p38δ mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and its function(s) in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESCC). In contrast to the three other p38 isoforms (p38α, -β and –γ which have to-date been relatively well-studied), p38δ MAPK signalling is poorly understood. Thus, this research elucidates some of the role(s) played by p38δ MAPK in cancer progression. This work outlines how loss of p38δ MAPK expression confers greater tumourigenicity in oesophageal cancer. Restoration of p38δ MAPK expression, however, has anti-proliferative and anti-migratory effects and decreases OESCC capacity for anchorageindependent growth. Using a novel application of an enzyme-substrate fusion approach, the effect of phosphorylated p38δ (p-p38δ) MAPK expression is also considered. The work goes onto describe the effect(s) of p38δ MAPK status on the chemosensitivity of OESCC to conventional cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus the effectiveness of doxorubicin, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (ACF). ACF treatment of p38δ MAPK-negative OESCC results in decreased proliferation, migration and recovery, and increased apoptosis when compared with CF treatment. This thesis examines the potential mechanisms by which p38δ MAPK expression is lost in OESCC and identifies epigenetic regulation as the probable cause of differential p38δ MAPK expression. Also analysed is the role p38δ MAPK and p-p38δ MAPK play in the cell cycle. In summary, this research identifies p38δ MAPK as a possible molecular target and a potential predictor of response to chemotherapy in OESCC patients.