Negotiating the boundaries between home and work practices: The case of home-workers

When people work from home, the domains of home and work are co-located, often under one roof. Home-workers have to cope with the meeting of two practices that have traditionally been physically separated. In light of this, we need to understand: how do people who work from home negotiate the boundaries between their home and work practices? What kinds of boundaries do people construct? How do boundaries affect the relationship between home and work as domains? What kinds of boundaries are available to home-workers? Are home-workers in charge of their boundaries or do they co-create them with others? How does this position home-workers in their domains? In order to address these questions, I analysed a variety of data, including newspaper columns, online forum discussions, interviews, and personal diary entries, using a discourse analytic approach that lends itself to issues of positioning. Current literature clashes over whether home-workers are in control of their boundaries, and over the relationship between home and work that arises out of boundary negotiations, i.e. whether home and work are dichotomous or layered. I seek to contribute to boundary theory by adopting a practice theory stance (Wenger, 1998) to guide my analysis. By viewing home and work as practices, I show that boundary negotiations depend on how home-workers are positioned, e.g. if they are positioned as peripheral in a domain, they lack influence over boundaries. I demonstrate that home and work constitute a number of different practices, rather than a rigid dichotomy, and that the way home and work are related are not the same for all home-workers. The application of practice concepts further shows how relationships between practices are created. The contribution of this work is a reconceptualisation of current boundary theory away from individual and cognitive notions (Nippert-Eng, 1996) into the realm of positioning.

Novel insights into the expression and function of p38δ MAPK in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Oesophageal cancer is an aggressive malignancy which is resistant to conventional therapy and has a poor prognosis. A greater understanding of the underlying molecular biology of oesophageal cancer and the identification of novel targets is necessary for the future treatment of this disease. This thesis focuses specifically on the ill-defined and understudied p38δ mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and its function(s) in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESCC). In contrast to the three other p38 isoforms (p38α, -β and –γ which have to-date been relatively well-studied), p38δ MAPK signalling is poorly understood. Thus, this research elucidates some of the role(s) played by p38δ MAPK in cancer progression. This work outlines how loss of p38δ MAPK expression confers greater tumourigenicity in oesophageal cancer. Restoration of p38δ MAPK expression, however, has anti-proliferative and anti-migratory effects and decreases OESCC capacity for anchorageindependent growth. Using a novel application of an enzyme-substrate fusion approach, the effect of phosphorylated p38δ (p-p38δ) MAPK expression is also considered. The work goes onto describe the effect(s) of p38δ MAPK status on the chemosensitivity of OESCC to conventional cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus the effectiveness of doxorubicin, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (ACF). ACF treatment of p38δ MAPK-negative OESCC results in decreased proliferation, migration and recovery, and increased apoptosis when compared with CF treatment. This thesis examines the potential mechanisms by which p38δ MAPK expression is lost in OESCC and identifies epigenetic regulation as the probable cause of differential p38δ MAPK expression. Also analysed is the role p38δ MAPK and p-p38δ MAPK play in the cell cycle. In summary, this research identifies p38δ MAPK as a possible molecular target and a potential predictor of response to chemotherapy in OESCC patients.

Nutrition, growth and body composition in infancy

This thesis is presented in two parts. Data for this research is from the Cork BASELINE (Babies after SCOPE, Evaluating Longitudinal Impact using Neurological and Nutritional Endpoints) Birth Cohort Study (n = 2137). In this prospective birth cohort study, pediatric follow-up with in-person appointments were repeated from the time of birth through to 2, 6 and 12 months, and at 2 years. Body composition was measured by air displacement plethysmography at birth and at 2 months using the PEA POD Infant Body Composition Tracking System. This thesis provides the first extensive report on the study’s 2 year assessment. In part one, the aims were to investigate potential early-life risk factors for childhood overweight and obesity, including rapid growth and body composition in infancy and umbilical cord concentrations of leptin and high molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin. This research is the first to describe rapid growth in early infancy in terms of changes in direct measures of body composition. These are also the first data to examine associations between umbilical cord leptin and HMW adiponectin concentrations and changes in fat and lean mass in early infancy. These data provide additional insight into characterising the growth trajectory in infancy and into the role of perinatal factors in determining infant growth and subsequent overweight/obesity risk. In part two of this thesis, the aims were to quantify vitamin D intake and status at 2 years and to investigate whether 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations in early pregnancy and in umbilical cord blood are associated with infant growth and body composition. There was a low prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among Irish 2 year olds (n = 742) despite a high prevalence of inadequate intakes and high latitude (51°N). Maternal 25(OH)D concentrations at 15 weeks gestation and cord 25(OH)D concentrations at delivery were not associated with infant growth or adiposity.