Lack of effect of lowering LDL cholesterol on cancer: meta-analysis of individual data from 175,000 people in 27 randomised trials of statin therapy

Background: Statin therapy reduces the risk of occlusive vascular events, but uncertainty remains about potential effects on cancer. We sought to provide a detailed assessment of any effects on cancer of lowering LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) with a statin using individual patient records from 175,000 patients in 27 large-scale statin trials. Methods and Findings: Individual records of 134,537 participants in 22 randomised trials of statin versus control (median duration 4.8 years) and 39,612 participants in 5 trials of more intensive versus less intensive statin therapy (median duration 5.1 years) were obtained. Reducing LDL-C with a statin for about 5 years had no effect on newly diagnosed cancer or on death from such cancers in either the trials of statin versus control (cancer incidence: 3755 [1.4% per year [py]] versus 3738 [1.4% py], RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.96-1.05]; cancer mortality: 1365 [0.5% py] versus 1358 [0.5% py], RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.93-1.08]) or in the trials of more versus less statin (cancer incidence: 1466 [1.6% py] vs 1472 [1.6% py], RR 1.00 [95% CI 0.93-1.07]; cancer mortality: 447 [0.5% py] versus 481 [0.5% py], RR 0.93 [95% CI 0.82-1.06]). Moreover, there was no evidence of any effect of reducing LDL-C with statin therapy on cancer incidence or mortality at any of 23 individual categories of sites, with increasing years of treatment, for any individual statin, or in any given subgroup. In particular, among individuals with low baseline LDL-C (<2 mmol/L), there was no evidence that further LDL-C reduction (from about 1.7 to 1.3 mmol/L) increased cancer risk (381 [1.6% py] versus 408 [1.7% py]; RR 0.92 [99% CI 0.76-1.10]). Conclusions: In 27 randomised trials, a median of five years of statin therapy had no effect on the incidence of, or mortality from, any type of cancer (or the aggregate of all cancer).

Bacteria and tumours: causative agents or opportunistic inhabitants?

Associations between different bacteria and various tumours have been reported in patients for decades. Studies involving characterisation of bacteria within tumour tissues have traditionally been in the context of tumourigenesis as a result of bacterial presence within healthy tissues, and in general, dogma holds that such bacteria are causative agents of malignancy (directly or indirectly). While evidence suggests that this may be the case for certain tumour types and bacterial species, it is plausible that in many cases, clinical observations of bacteria within tumours arise from spontaneous infection of established tumours. Indeed, growth of bacteria specifically within tumours following deliberate systemic administration has been demonstrated for numerous bacterial species at preclinical and clinical levels. We present the available data on links between bacteria and tumours, and propose that besides the few instances in which pathogens are playing a pathogenic role in cancer, in many instances, the prevalent relationship between solid tumours and bacteria is opportunistic rather than causative, and discuss opportunities for exploiting tumour-specific bacterial growth for cancer treatment.

Gene delivery for the treatment of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers diagnosed in men. Whilst treatments for early-stage disease are largely effective, current therapies for metastatic prostate cancer, particularly for bone metastasis, offer only a few months increased lifespan at best. Hence new treatments are urgently required. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) has been investigated for the treatment of prostate cancer where it can ‘silence’ specific cancer-related genes. However the clinical application of siRNA-based gene therapy is limited due to the absence of an optimised gene delivery vector. The optimisation of such gene delivery vectors is routinely undertaken in vitro using 2D cell culture on plastic dishes which does not accurately simulate the in vivo bone cancer metastasis microenvironment. The goal of this thesis was to assess the potential of two different targeted delivery vectors (gold or modified β-cyclodextrin derivatives) to facilitate siRNA receptor-mediated uptake into prostate cancer cells. Furthermore, this project aimed to develop a more physiologically relevant 3D in vitro cell culture model, to mimic prostate cancer bone metastasis, which is suitable for evaluating the delivery of nanoparticulate gene therapeutics. In the first instance, cationic derivatives of gold and β-cyclodextrin were synthesized to complex anionic siRNA. The delivery vectors were targeted to prostate cancer cells using the anisamide ligand which has high affinity for the sigma receptor that is overexpressed by prostate cancer cells. The gold nanoparticle demonstrated high levels of uptake into prostate cancer PC3 cells and efficient gene silencing when transfection was performed in serum-free media. However, due to the absence of a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) stabilising group, the formulation was unsuitable for use in serum-containing conditions. Conversely, the modified β-cyclodextrin formulation demonstrated enhanced stability in the presence of serum due to the inclusion of a PEG chain onto which the anisamide ligand was conjugated. However, the maximum level of gene silencing efficacy from three different prostate cancer cell lines (DU145, VCaP and PC3 cells) was 30 %, suggesting that further optimisation of the formulation would be required prior to application in vivo. In order to develop a more physiologically-relevant in vitro model of prostate cancer bone metastasis, prostate cancer cells (PC3 and LNCaP cells) were cultured in 3D on collagenbased scaffolds engineered to mimic the bone microenvironment. While the model was suitable for assessing nanoparticle-mediated gene knockdown, prostate cancer cells demonstrated a phenotype with lower invasive potential when grown on the scaffolds relative to standard 2D cell culture. Hence, prostate cancer cells (PC3 and LNCaP cells) were subsequently co-cultured with bone osteoblast cells (hFOB 1.19 cells) to enhance the physiological relevance of the model. Co-cultures secreted elevated levels of the MMP9 enzyme, a marker of prostate cancer metastasis, relative to prostate cancer cell monocultures (2D and 3D) indicating enhanced physiological relevance of the model. Furthermore, the coculture model proved suitable for investigating nanoparticle-mediated gene silencing. In conclusion, the work outlined in this thesis identified two different sigma receptor-targeted gene delivery vectors with potential for the treatment of prostate cancer. In addition, a more physiologically relevant model of prostate cancer bone metastasis was developed with the capacity to help optimise gene delivery vectors for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Effect of investigation intensity and treatment differences on prostate cancer survivor's physical symptoms, psychological well-being and health-related quality of life: a two country cross-sectional study.

Aim: To investigate effects on men's health and well-being of higher prostate cancer (PCa) investigation and treatment levels in similar populations. Participants: PCa survivors in Ireland where the Republic of Ireland (RoI) has a 50% higher PCa incidence than Northern Ireland (NI). Method: A cross-sectional postal questionnaire was sent to PCa survivors 2–18 years post-treatment, seeking information about current physical effects of treatment, health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EORTC QLQ-C30; EQ-5D-5L) and psychological well-being (21 question version of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, DASS-21). Outcomes in RoI and NI survivors were compared, stratifying into ‘late disease’ (stage III/IV and any Gleason grade (GG) at diagnosis) and ‘early disease’ (stage I/II and GG 2–7). Responses were weighted by age, jurisdiction and time since diagnosis. Between-country differences were investigated using multivariate logistic and linear regression. Results: 3348 men responded (RoI n=2567; NI n=781; reflecting population sizes, response rate 54%). RoI responders were younger; less often had comorbidities (45% vs 38%); were more likely to present asymptomatically (66%; 41%) or with early disease (56%; 35%); and less often currently used androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; 2%; 28%). Current prevalence of incontinence (16%) and impotence (56% early disease, 67% late disease) did not differ between RoI and NI. In early disease, only current bowel problems (RoI 12%; NI 21%) differed significantly in multivariate analysis. In late disease, NI men reported significantly higher levels of gynaecomastia (23% vs 9%) and hot flashes(41% vs 19%), but when ADT users were analysed separately, differences disappeared. For HRQoL, in multivariate analysis, only pain (early disease: RoI 11.1, NI 19.4) and financial difficulties (late disease: RoI 10.4, NI 7.9) differed significantly between countries. There were no significant between-country differences in DASS-21 or index ED-5D-5L score. Conclusions: Treatment side effects were commonly reported and increased PCa detection in RoI has left more men with these side effects. We recommended that men be offered a PSA test only after informed discussion.