1 resultado para Biased signaling
em CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (2)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (5)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (42)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (39)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (143)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (9)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (10)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (68)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (40)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (75)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (2)
- Duke University (33)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (15)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (54)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (25)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (108)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (66)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (6)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (59)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (11)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (16)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (19)
- University of Connecticut - USA (3)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
The influence of communication technology on group decision-making has been examined in many studies. But the findings are inconsistent. Some studies showed a positive effect on decision quality, other studies have shown that communication technology makes the decision even worse. One possible explanation for these different findings could be the use of different Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) in these studies, with some GDSS better fitting to the given task than others and with different sets of functions. This paper outlines an approach with an information system solely designed to examine the effect of (1) anonymity, (2) voting and (3) blind picking on decision quality, discussion quality and perceived quality of information.