Redefining military memorials and commemoration and how they have changed since the 19th century with a focus on Anglo-American practice

This thesis is a study of military memorials and commemoration with a focus on Anglo-American practice. The main question is: How has history defined military memorials and commemoration and how have they changed since the 19th century. In an effort to resolve this, the work examines both historic and contemporary forms of memorials and commemoration and establishes that remembrance in sites of collective memory has been influenced by politics, conflicts and religion. Much has been written since the Great War about remembrance and memorialization; however, there is no common lexicon throughout the literature. In order to better explain and understand this complex subject, the work includes an up-to-date literature review and for the first time, terminologies are properly explained and defined. Particular attention is placed on recognizing important military legacies, being familiar with spiritual influences and identifying classic and new signs of remembrance. The thesis contends that commemoration is composed of three key principles – recognition, respect and reflection – that are intractably linked to the fabric of memorials. It also argues that it is time for the study of memorials to come of age and proposes Memorialogy as an interdisciplinary field of study of memorials and associated commemorative practices. Moreover, a more modern, adaptive, General Classification System is presented as a means of identifying and re-defining memorials according to certain groups, types and forms. Lastly, this thesis examines how peacekeeping and peace support operations are being memorialized and how the American tragic events of 11 September 2001 and the war in Afghanistan have forever changed the nature of memorials and commemoration within Canada and elsewhere. This work goes beyond what has been studied and written about over the last century and provides a deeper level of analysis and a fresh approach to understanding the field of Memorialogy.

The role of mitogen activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 in neurotoxic and inflammatory-induced changes in the development of midbrain dopaminergic neurons: relevance to Parkinson’s disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterised by the loss of midbrain dopaminergic neurons from the substantia nigra pars compacta(SNpc), which results in motor, cognitive and psychiatric symptoms. Evidence supports a role for the mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 in the demise of dopaminergic neurons, while mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 (MKP-1), which negatively regulates p38 activity, has not yet been investigated in this context. Inflammation may also be associated with the neuropathology of PD due to evidence of increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) within the SNpc. Because of the specific loss of dopaminergic neurons in a discreet region of the brain, PD is considered a suitable candidate for cell replacement therapy but challenges remain to optimise dopaminergic cell survival and morphological development. The present thesis examined the role of MKP-1 in neurotoxic and inflammatory-induced changes in the development of midbrain dopaminergic neurons. We show that MKP-1 is expressed in dopaminergic neurons cultured from embryonic day (E) 14 rat ventral mesencephalon (VM). Inhibition of dopaminergic neurite growth induced by treatment of rat VM neurons with the dopaminergic neurotoxin 6- hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) is mediated by p38, and is concomitant with a significant and selective decrease in MKP-1 expression in these neurons. Dopaminergic neurons transfected to overexpress MKP-1 displayed a more complex morphology and contributed to neuroprotection against the effects of 6-OHDA. Therefore, MKP-1 expression can promote the growth and elaboration of dopaminergic neuronal processes and can help protect them from the neurotoxic effects of 6-OHDA. Neural precursor cells (NPCs) have emerged as promising alternative candidates to fetal VM for cell replacement strategies in PD. Here we show that phosphorylated (and thus activated) p38 and MKP-1 are expressed at basal levels in untreated E14 rat VM NPCs (nestin, DCX, GFAP and DAT-positive cells) following proliferation as well as in their differentiated progeny (DCX, DAT, GFAP and βIII-tubulin) in vitro. Challenge with 6-OHDA or IL-1β changed the expression of endogenous phospho-p38 and MKP-1 in these cells in a time-dependent manner, and so the dynamic balance in expression may mediate the detrimental effects of neurotoxicity and inflammation in proliferating and differentiating NPCs. We demonstrate that there was an up-regulation in MKP-1 mRNA expression in adult rat midbrain tissue 4 days post lesion in two rat models of PD; the 6-OHDA medial forebrain bundle (MFB) model and the four-site 6-OHDA striatal lesion model. This was concomitant with a decrease in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNA expression at 4 and 10 days post-lesion in the MFB model and 10 and 28 days post-lesion in the striatal lesion model. There was no change in mRNA expression of the pro-apoptotic gene, bax and the anti-apoptotic gene, bcl-2 in the midbrain and striatum. These data suggest that the early and transient upregulation of MKP-1 mRNA in the midbrain at 4 days post-6-OHDA administration may be indicative of an attempt by dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain to protect against the neurotoxic effects of 6-OHDA at later time points. Collectively, these findings show that MKP-1 is expressed by developing and adult dopaminergic neurons in the midbrain, and can promote their morphological development. MKP-1 also exerts neuroprotective effects against dopaminergic neurotoxins in vitro, and its expression in dopaminergic neurons can be modulated by inflammatory and neurotoxic insults both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, these data contribute to the information needed to develop therapeutic strategies for protecting midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the context of PD.

Towards a new model of criminal justice system in the era of globalised criminality: the biggest challenges for criminal process legislation

The main objective of this thesis is the critical analysis of the evolution of the criminal justice systems throughout the past decade, with special attention to the fight against transnational terrorism. It is evident – for any observer - that such threats and the associated risk that terrorism entails, has changed significantly throughout the past decade. This perception has generated answers – many times radical ones – by States, as they have committed themselves to warrant the safety of their populations and to ease a growing sentiment of social panic. This thesis seeks to analyse the characteristics of this new threat and the responses that States have developed in the fight against terrorism since 9/11, which have questioned some of the essential principles and values in place in their own legal systems. In such sense, freedom and security are placed into perspective throughout the analysis of the specific antiterrorist legal reforms of five different States: Israel, Portugal, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. On the other hand, in light of those antiterrorist reforms, it will be questioned if it is possible to speak of the emergence of a new system of criminal justice (and of a process of a convergence between common law and civil law systems), built upon a control and preventive security framework, significantly different from traditional models. Finally, this research project has the fundamental objective to contribute to a better understanding on the economic, social and civilization costs of those legal reforms regarding human rights, the rule of law and democracy in modern States.