1 resultado para sperm donor
em Boston University Digital Common
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (7)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (6)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (8)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (23)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (8)
- Bioline International (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (77)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (33)
- Chapman University Digital Commons - CA - USA (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (66)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (23)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (4)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (86)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (7)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (2)
- Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (68)
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (31)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (5)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (5)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (84)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (37)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (3)
- Repositório Institucional dos Hospitais da Universidade Coimbra (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (217)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (3)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (3)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (8)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (7)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (37)
- University of Washington (2)
Resumo:
Literature on the nonprofit sector focuses on charities and their interactions with clients or governmental agencies; donors are studied less often. Studies on philanthropy do examine donors but tend to focus on microlevel factors to explain their behavior. This study, in contrast, draws on institutional theory to show that macrolevel factors affect donor behavior. It also extends the institutional framework by examining the field‐level configurations in which donors and fundraisers are embedded. Employing the case of workplace charity, this new model highlights how the composition of the organizational field structures fundraisers and donors alike, shaping fundraisers’ strategies of solicitation and, therefore, the extent of donor control.