Manual of missions, by Carl Leroy Howland, Ph. B., with an introduction by Bishop Wilson T. Hogue.

http://www.archive.org/details/manualofmissions014078mbp

Exponential sensitivity of noise-driven switching in genetic networks

Cells are known to utilize biochemical noise to probabilistically switch between distinct gene expression states. We demonstrate that such noise-driven switching is dominated by tails of probability distributions and is therefore exponentially sensitive to changes in physiological parameters such as transcription and translation rates. However, provided mRNA lifetimes are short, switching can still be accurately simulated using protein-only models of gene expression. Exponential sensitivity limits the robustness of noise-driven switching, suggesting cells may use other mechanisms in order to switch reliably.

On Finding Sensitivity of Quantum and Classical Gates

We consider a fault model of Boolean gates, both classical and quantum, where some of the inputs may not be connected to the actual gate hardware. This model is somewhat similar to the stuck-at model which is a very popular model in testing Boolean circuits. We consider the problem of detecting such faults; the detection algorithm can query the faulty gate and its complexity is the number of such queries. This problem is related to determining the sensitivity of Boolean functions. We show how quantum parallelism can be used to detect such faults. Specifically, we show that a quantum algorithm can detect such faults more efficiently than a classical algorithm for a Parity gate and an AND gate. We give explicit constructions of quantum detector algorithms and show lower bounds for classical algorithms. We show that the model for detecting such faults is similar to algebraic decision trees and extend some known results from quantum query complexity to prove some of our results.

Determining Acceptance Possibility for a Quantum Computation is Hard for PH

It is shown that determining whether a quantum computation has a non-zero probability of accepting is at least as hard as the polynomial time hierarchy. This hardness result also applies to determining in general whether a given quantum basis state appears with nonzero amplitude in a superposition, or whether a given quantum bit has positive expectation value at the end of a quantum computation.

Adaptation of Dopamine Neurons' Mismatch Sensitivity Is not Compatible With Reinforcement Learning Theory

Recent electrophysical data inspired the claim that dopaminergic neurons adapt their mismatch sensitivities to reflect variances of expected rewards. This contradicts reward prediction error theory and most basal ganglia models. Application of learning principles points to a testable alternative interpretation-of the same data-that is compatible with existing theory.