On Finding Sensitivity of Quantum and Classical Gates

We consider a fault model of Boolean gates, both classical and quantum, where some of the inputs may not be connected to the actual gate hardware. This model is somewhat similar to the stuck-at model which is a very popular model in testing Boolean circuits. We consider the problem of detecting such faults; the detection algorithm can query the faulty gate and its complexity is the number of such queries. This problem is related to determining the sensitivity of Boolean functions. We show how quantum parallelism can be used to detect such faults. Specifically, we show that a quantum algorithm can detect such faults more efficiently than a classical algorithm for a Parity gate and an AND gate. We give explicit constructions of quantum detector algorithms and show lower bounds for classical algorithms. We show that the model for detecting such faults is similar to algebraic decision trees and extend some known results from quantum query complexity to prove some of our results.

Iterative Linearized Density Matrix Propagation for Modeling Coherent Energy Transfer in Photosynthetic Light Harvesting

We present results of calculations [1] that employ a new mixed quantum classical iterative density matrix propagation approach (ILDM , or so called Is‐Landmap) [2] to explore the survival of coherence in different photo synthetic models. Our model studies confirm the long lived quantum coherence , while conventional theoretical tools (such as Redfield equation) fail to describe these phenomenon [3,4]. Our ILDM method is a numerical exactly propagation scheme and can be served as a bench mark calculation tools[2]. Result get from ILDM and from other recent methods have been compared and show agreement with each other[4,5]. Long lived coherence plateau has been attribute to the shift of harmonic potential due to the system bath interaction, and the harvesting efficiency is a balance between the coherence and dissipation[1]. We use this approach to investigate the excitation energy transfer dynamics in various light harvesting complex include Fenna‐Matthews‐Olsen light harvesting complex[1] and Cryptophyte Phycocyanin 645 [6]. [1] P.Huo and D.F.Coker ,J. Chem. Phys. 133, 184108 (2010) . [2] E.R. Dunkel, S. Bonella, and D.F. Coker, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 114106 (2008). [3] A. Ishizaki and G.R. Fleming, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 234111 (2009). [4] A. Ishizaki and G.R. Fleming, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 17255 (2009). [5] G. Tao and W.H. Miller, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 891 (2010). [6] P.Huo and D.F.Coker in preparation

Bounds on the Power of Constant-Depth Quantum Circuits

We show that if a language is recognized within certain error bounds by constant-depth quantum circuits over a finite family of gates, then it is computable in (classical) polynomial time. In particular, our results imply EQNC^0 ⊆ P, where EQNC^0 is the constant-depth analog of the class EQP. On the other hand, we adapt and extend ideas of Terhal and DiVincenzo [?] to show that, for any family

Small Depth Quantum Circuits

Small depth quantum circuits have proved to be unexpectedly powerful in comparison to their classical counterparts. We survey some of the recent work on this and present some open problems.