Hindrances to the work of the church in the world : a series of sermons / by the Lord Bishop of Bath and Wells ... [et al.]

http://www.archive.org/details/hindrancestothew00unknuoft

Stinklepus Stinkleby Takes A Bath

This book was donated to BU by its author Stephanie Angelini, 2005 College of Communication alumna. All e-book versions of this work display best on the widest margin settings and the largest font setting. You may download the free Kindle reading software here: http://is.gd/yg9P5k ***PLEASE NOTE:*** The author has permitted us to make the book available to the BU community only. To download the files, please click on the appropriate lock icon and log in with your BU credentials. Thank you.

Safe Composition of Web Communication Protocols for Extensible Edge Services

As new multi-party edge services are deployed on the Internet, application-layer protocols with complex communication models and event dependencies are increasingly being specified and adopted. To ensure that such protocols (and compositions thereof with existing protocols) do not result in undesirable behaviors (e.g., livelocks) there needs to be a methodology for the automated checking of the "safety" of these protocols. In this paper, we present ingredients of such a methodology. Specifically, we show how SPIN, a tool from the formal systems verification community, can be used to quickly identify problematic behaviors of application-layer protocols with non-trivial communication models—such as HTTP with the addition of the "100 Continue" mechanism. As a case study, we examine several versions of the specification for the Continue mechanism; our experiments mechanically uncovered multi-version interoperability problems, including some which motivated revisions of HTTP/1.1 and some which persist even with the current version of the protocol. One such problem resembles a classic degradation-of-service attack, but can arise between well-meaning peers. We also discuss how the methods we employ can be used to make explicit the requirements for hardening a protocol's implementation against potentially malicious peers, and for verifying an implementation's interoperability with the full range of allowable peer behaviors.