A New Lower Bound Technique for Quantum Circuits without Ancillae

We present a technique to derive depth lower bounds for quantum circuits. The technique is based on the observation that in circuits without ancillae, only a few input states can set all the control qubits of a Toffoli gate to 1. This can be used to selectively remove large Toffoli gates from a quantum circuit while keeping the cumulative error low. We use the technique to give another proof that parity cannot be computed by constant depth quantum circuits without ancillæ.

On Finding Sensitivity of Quantum and Classical Gates

We consider a fault model of Boolean gates, both classical and quantum, where some of the inputs may not be connected to the actual gate hardware. This model is somewhat similar to the stuck-at model which is a very popular model in testing Boolean circuits. We consider the problem of detecting such faults; the detection algorithm can query the faulty gate and its complexity is the number of such queries. This problem is related to determining the sensitivity of Boolean functions. We show how quantum parallelism can be used to detect such faults. Specifically, we show that a quantum algorithm can detect such faults more efficiently than a classical algorithm for a Parity gate and an AND gate. We give explicit constructions of quantum detector algorithms and show lower bounds for classical algorithms. We show that the model for detecting such faults is similar to algebraic decision trees and extend some known results from quantum query complexity to prove some of our results.

On the Complexity of Quantum ACC

For any q > 1, let MOD_q be a quantum gate that determines if the number of 1's in the input is divisible by q. We show that for any q,t > 1, MOD_q is equivalent to MOD_t (up to constant depth). Based on the case q=2, Moore has shown that quantum analogs of AC^(0), ACC[q], and ACC, denoted QAC^(0)_wf, QACC[2], QACC respectively, define the same class of operators, leaving q > 2 as an open question. Our result resolves this question, implying that QAC^(0)_wf = QACC[q] = QACC for all q. We also prove the first upper bounds for QACC in terms of related language classes. We define classes of languages EQACC, NQACC (both for arbitrary complex amplitudes) and BQACC (for rational number amplitudes) and show that they are all contained in TC^(0). To do this, we show that a TC^(0) circuit can keep track of the amplitudes of the state resulting from the application of a QACC operator using a constant width polynomial size tensor sum. In order to accomplish this, we also show that TC^(0) can perform iterated addition and multiplication in certain field extensions.