In southern India : a visit to some of the chief mission stations in the Madras presidency / by Mrs. Murray Mitchell.

http://www.archive.org/details/insouthernindivi00mitcuoft

The Missionary pioneer, or, A brief memoir of the life, labours, and death of John Stewart, (man of colour) founder, under God of the mission among the Wyandotts at Upper Sandusky, Ohio / Published by Joseph Mitchell.

http://www.archive.org/details/missionarypionee00stewrich

The Undecidability of Mitchell's Subtyping Relationship

Mitchell defined and axiomatized a subtyping relationship (also known as containment, coercibility, or subsumption) over the types of System F (with "→" and "∀"). This subtyping relationship is quite simple and does not involve bounded quantification. Tiuryn and Urzyczyn quite recently proved this subtyping relationship to be undecidable. This paper supplies a new undecidability proof for this subtyping relationship. First, a new syntax-directed axiomatization of the subtyping relationship is defined. Then, this axiomatization is used to prove a reduction from the undecidable problem of semi-unification to subtyping. The undecidability of subtyping implies the undecidability of type checking for System F extended with Mitchell's subtyping, also known as "F plus eta".

Typability is Undecidable for F+Eta

System F is the well-known polymorphically-typed λ-calculus with universal quantifiers ("∀"). F+η is System F extended with the eta rule, which says that if term M can be given type τ and M η-reduces to N, then N can also be given the type τ. Adding the eta rule to System F is equivalent to adding the subsumption rule using the subtyping ("containment") relation that Mitchell defined and axiomatized [Mit88]. The subsumption rule says that if M can be given type τ and τ is a subtype of type σ, then M can be given type σ. Mitchell's subtyping relation involves no extensions to the syntax of types, i.e., no bounded polymorphism and no supertype of all types, and is thus unrelated to the system F≤("F-sub"). Typability for F+η is the problem of determining for any term M whether there is any type τ that can be given to it using the type inference rules of F+η. Typability has been proven undecidable for System F [Wel94] (without the eta rule), but the decidability of typability has been an open problem for F+η. Mitchell's subtyping relation has recently been proven undecidable [TU95, Wel95b], implying the undecidability of "type checking" for F+η. This paper reduces the problem of subtyping to the problem of typability for F+η, thus proving the undecidability of typability. The proof methods are similar in outline to those used to prove the undecidability of typability for System F, but the fine details differ greatly.